These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35556151)

  • 1. Assessing comprehension of online information in the United States for third-line treatment of overactive bladder.
    Werner Z; Trump T; Zaslau S; Shapiro R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Mar; 34(3):701-705. PubMed ID: 35556151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
    Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability analysis of online health information about overactive bladder.
    Koo K; Shee K; Yap RL
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Sep; 36(7):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 27794197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internet Health Resources on Nocturnal Enuresis: A Readability, Quality, and Accuracy Analysis.
    Fung ACH; Lee MHL; Leung JL; Chan IHY; Wong KKY
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2024 Feb; 34(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 37595631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clear as Mud: Readability Scores in Cloacal Exstrophy Literature and Its Treatment.
    Haffar A; Hirsch A; Morrill C; Garcia A; Werner Z; Gearhart JP; Crigger C
    Res Rep Urol; 2024; 16():39-44. PubMed ID: 38370509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
    Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analyzing the Readability of Online Urogynecologic Patient Information.
    Stewart JR; Heit MH; Meriwether KV; Hobson DT; Francis SL
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 29117016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability, reliability and credibility of online patient information on skin grafts.
    Heaven CL; Patel C; Ahmadi O; Mathy JA
    Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 64(1):e57-e64. PubMed ID: 36354108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.
    Kaya E; Görmez S
    Rheumatol Int; 2022 Nov; 42(11):1965-1972. PubMed ID: 35763090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.
    Han A; Carayannopoulos AG
    PM R; 2020 Apr; 12(4):368-373. PubMed ID: 31361388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability of Online Patient Information Relating to Cleft Palate Surgery.
    Lavin CV; Fahy EJ; Abbas DB; Griffin M; Deleon NMD; Lee DK; Khosla RK; Bruckman K; Lorenz HP; Wan DC
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2022 Mar; 59(3):330-335. PubMed ID: 33960204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Online Resources on Unspecified Kidney Donation.
    Stavropoulou-Tatla S; Awal DH; Fardanesh A; McCaig F; Hossain MA
    Transplant Proc; 2022 Apr; 54(3):582-586. PubMed ID: 35307169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of the readability and visual appearance of online patient resources for fibroadenoma.
    Hutchings HA; Remesh A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277823. PubMed ID: 36399450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.