These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35558144)

  • 21. The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidence.
    Greenspan R; Scurich N
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):650-659. PubMed ID: 27149289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. False confessions.
    Kassin SM
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 28485886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Police tactics and guilt status uniquely influence suspects' physiologic reactivity and resistance to confess.
    Normile CJ; Scherr KC
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Dec; 42(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 30284849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence strength (insufficiently) affects police officers' decisions to place a suspect in a lineup.
    Katzman J; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 34968099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the power of confession evidence: an experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis.
    Kassin SM; Neumann K
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Oct; 21(5):469-84. PubMed ID: 9374602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling the influence of investigator bias on the elicitation of true and false confessions.
    Narchet FM; Meissner CA; Russano MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):452-65. PubMed ID: 21161571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When do we believe experts? The power of the unorthodox view.
    Alison L; Almond L; Christiansen P; Waring S; Power N; Villejoubert G
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):729-48. PubMed ID: 23042647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
    Henderson KS; Levett LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Admissibility of false-confession testimony: know thy standard.
    Quintieri P; Weiss KJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):535-8. PubMed ID: 16394232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A national epidemiological study investigating risk factors for police interrogation and false confession among juveniles and young persons.
    Gudjonsson GH; Sigurdsson JF; Sigfusdottir ID; Asgeirsdottir BB; González RA; Young S
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 26537245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Incentives increase the rate of false but not true secondary confessions from informants with an allegiance to a suspect.
    Swanner JK; Beike DR
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):418-28. PubMed ID: 20107880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt.
    Pearson JM; Law JR; Skene JAG; Beskind DH; Vidmar N; Ball DA; Malekpour A; Carter RM; Skene JHP
    Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Nov; 2(11):856-866. PubMed ID: 30931399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An explanation for camera perspective bias in voluntariness judgment for video-recorded confession: Suggestion of cognitive frame.
    Park K; Pyo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):184-94. PubMed ID: 22667808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring the diagnostic utility of facial composites: beliefs of guilt can bias perceived similarity between composite and suspect.
    Charman SD; Gregory AH; Carlucci M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 19309218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession.
    Woestehoff SA; Meissner CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):564-79. PubMed ID: 27227274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Memory Errors in Alibi Generation: How an Alibi Can Turn Against Us.
    Crozier WE; Strange D; Loftus EF
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 28165152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lost proof of innocence: The impact of confessions on alibi witnesses.
    Marion SB; Kukucka J; Collins C; Kassin SM; Burke TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 26301711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interrogations, confessions, and guilty pleas among serious adolescent offenders.
    Malloy LC; Shulman EP; Cauffman E
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):181-93. PubMed ID: 24127891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retracted confessions: through opiate withdrawal to a new conceptual framework.
    Davison SE; Forshaw DM
    Med Sci Law; 1993 Oct; 33(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 8264359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Confession and self-control: A prelude to repentance or relapse?
    Lowe ML; Haws KL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Apr; 116(4):563-581. PubMed ID: 30321047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.