These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35560220)

  • 1. Pre-processing data to reduce biases: full matching incorporating an instrumental variable in population-based studies.
    Cerna-Turoff I; Maurer K; Baiocchi M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 51(6):1920-1930. PubMed ID: 35560220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Did internal displacement from the 2010 earthquake in Haiti lead to long-term violence against children? A matched pairs study design.
    Cerna-Turoff I; Kane JC; Devries K; Mercy J; Massetti G; Baiocchi M
    Child Abuse Negl; 2020 Apr; 102():104393. PubMed ID: 32062165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2505-2525. PubMed ID: 26329750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The productivity of mental health care: an instrumental variable approach.
    Lu M
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 1999 Jun; 2(2):59-71. PubMed ID: 11967410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Near-Far Matching in R: The nearfar Package.
    Rigdon J; Baiocchi M; Basu S
    J Stat Softw; 2018; 86(CS-5):. PubMed ID: 30386186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The missing cause approach to unmeasured confounding in pharmacoepidemiology.
    Abrahamowicz M; Bjerre LM; Beauchamp ME; LeLorier J; Burne R
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(7):1001-16. PubMed ID: 26932124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of a constraint on the maximum number of controls matched to each treated subject on the performance of full matching on the propensity score when estimating risk differences.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 33027845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time dependent hazard ratio estimation using instrumental variables without conditioning on an omitted covariate.
    MacKenzie TA; Martinez-Camblor P; O'Malley AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 33743583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confounding and regression adjustment in difference-in-differences studies.
    Zeldow B; Hatfield LA
    Health Serv Res; 2021 Oct; 56(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33978956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal matching with a variable number of controls vs. a fixed number of controls for a cohort study. trade-offs.
    Cepeda MS; Boston R; Farrar JT; Strom BL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Mar; 56(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 12725877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating long-term effects of a psychiatric treatment using instrumental variable and matching approaches.
    Lu B; Marcus S
    Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol; 2012 Dec; 12(4):288-301. PubMed ID: 23483774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2119-2139. PubMed ID: 31694489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.
    Stukel TA; Fisher ES; Wennberg DE; Alter DA; Gottlieb DJ; Vermeulen MJ
    JAMA; 2007 Jan; 297(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 17227979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjusting for confounding by indication in observational studies: a case study in traumatic brain injury.
    Cnossen MC; van Essen TA; Ceyisakar IE; Polinder S; Andriessen TM; van der Naalt J; Haitsma I; Horn J; Franschman G; Vos PE; Peul WC; Menon DK; Maas AI; Steyerberg EW; Lingsma HF
    Clin Epidemiol; 2018; 10():841-852. PubMed ID: 30050328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of subset matching methods and forms of covariate balance.
    de Los Angeles Resa M; Zubizarreta JR
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(27):4961-4979. PubMed ID: 27442072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis approaches to address treatment nonadherence in pragmatic trials with point-treatment settings: a simulation study.
    Hossain MB; Mosquera L; Karim ME
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):46. PubMed ID: 35172746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new weighted balance measure helped to select the variables to be included in a propensity score model.
    Caruana E; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M; Pirracchio R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1415-22.e2. PubMed ID: 26050059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.