These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35560294)

  • 1. Towards health-based nano reference values (HNRVs) for occupational exposure: Recommendations from an expert panel.
    Visser M; Gosens I; Bard D; van Broekhuizen P; Janer G; Kuempel E; Riediker M; Vogel U; Dekkers S
    NanoImpact; 2022 Apr; 26():100396. PubMed ID: 35560294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Workshop report: strategies for setting occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials.
    Gordon SC; Butala JH; Carter JM; Elder A; Gordon T; Gray G; Sayre PG; Schulte PA; Tsai CS; West J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 68(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 24462629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterizing risk assessments for the development of occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials.
    Schulte PA; Kuempel ED; Drew NM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 95():207-219. PubMed ID: 29574195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International landscape of limits and recommendations for occupational exposure to engineered nanomaterials.
    Rodríguez-Ibarra C; Déciga-Alcaraz A; Ispanixtlahuatl-Meráz O; Medina-Reyes EI; Delgado-Buenrostro NL; Chirino YI
    Toxicol Lett; 2020 Apr; 322():111-119. PubMed ID: 31981686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk.
    Cohen Y; Rallo R; Liu R; Liu HH
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):802-12. PubMed ID: 23138971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Achieving Control of Occupational Exposures to Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Juric A; Meldrum R; Liberda EN
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(8):501-8. PubMed ID: 25635953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occupational exposure limits for manufactured nanomaterials, a systematic review.
    Mihalache R; Verbeek J; Graczyk H; Murashov V; van Broekhuizen P
    Nanotoxicology; 2017 Feb; 11(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 27894206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occupational Exposures to Engineered Nanomaterials: a Review of Workplace Exposure Assessment Methods.
    McCormick S; Niang M; Dahm MM
    Curr Environ Health Rep; 2021 Sep; 8(3):223-234. PubMed ID: 34101152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nanotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) to environmentally relevant beneficial soil bacteria - a critical review.
    Lewis RW; Bertsch PM; McNear DH
    Nanotoxicology; 2019 Apr; 13(3):392-428. PubMed ID: 30760121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic Review of Screening and Surveillance Programs to Protect Workers from Nanomaterials.
    Gulumian M; Verbeek J; Andraos C; Sanabria N; de Jager P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166071. PubMed ID: 27829014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A critical evaluation of the fish early-life stage toxicity test for engineered nanomaterials: experimental modifications and recommendations.
    Shaw BJ; Liddle CC; Windeatt KM; Handy RD
    Arch Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 90(9):2077-2107. PubMed ID: 27318802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ecophysiological perspectives on engineered nanomaterial toxicity in fish and crustaceans.
    Callaghan NI; MacCormack TJ
    Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Mar; 193():30-41. PubMed ID: 28017784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Importance of exposure dynamics of metal-based nano-ZnO, -Cu and -Pb governing the metabolic potential of soil bacterial communities.
    Zhai Y; Hunting ER; Wouterse M; Peijnenburg WJGM; Vijver MG
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Nov; 145():349-358. PubMed ID: 28759764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Form-Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano-Ag, Nano-TiO
    Hong H; Adam V; Nowack B
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Sep; 40(9):2629-2639. PubMed ID: 34171135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nanomaterial toxicity testing in the 21st century: use of a predictive toxicological approach and high-throughput screening.
    Nel A; Xia T; Meng H; Wang X; Lin S; Ji Z; Zhang H
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):607-21. PubMed ID: 22676423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control Banding Tools for Engineered Nanoparticles: What the Practitioner Needs to Know.
    Dunn KH; Eastlake AC; Story M; Kuempel ED
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 29529138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model for screening and prioritizing consumer nanoproduct risks: A case study from South Africa.
    Musee N
    Environ Int; 2017 Mar; 100():121-131. PubMed ID: 28089582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toxicities of copper oxide nanomaterial and copper sulphate in early life stage zebrafish: Effects of pH and intermittent pulse exposure.
    Boyle D; Clark NJ; Handy RD
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Mar; 190():109985. PubMed ID: 31841893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification and avoidance of potential artifacts and misinterpretations in nanomaterial ecotoxicity measurements.
    Petersen EJ; Henry TB; Zhao J; MacCuspie RI; Kirschling TL; Dobrovolskaia MA; Hackley V; Xing B; White JC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(8):4226-46. PubMed ID: 24617739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: practical experiences and recommendations from the bench.
    Handy RD; Cornelis G; Fernandes T; Tsyusko O; Decho A; Sabo-Attwood T; Metcalfe C; Steevens JA; Klaine SJ; Koelmans AA; Horne N
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Jan; 31(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 22002667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.