These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3556101)

  • 1. Evaluation of contextual analysis for computer classification of cervical smears.
    Garcia GL; Kuklinski WS; Zahniser DJ; Oud PS; Vooys PG; Brenner JF
    Cytometry; 1987 Mar; 8(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 3556101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual analysis and intermediate cell markers enhance high-resolution cell image analysis for automated cervical smear diagnosis.
    Zahniser DJ; Wong KL; Brenner JF; Ball HG; Garcia GL; Hutchinson ML
    Cytometry; 1991; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 1705494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thionine-Feulgen-Congo red staining of cervical smears for the BioPEPR image-analysis system.
    Oud PS; Zahniser DJ; Raaijmakers MC; Vooijs PG; Van de Walle RT
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Dec; 3(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 6174058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated prescreening of conventionally prepared cervical smears: a feasibility study.
    Bartoo GT; Lee JS; Bartels PH; Kiviat NB; Nelson AC
    Lab Invest; 1992 Jan; 66(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 1731146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LEYTAS analysis of cytological specimens: the results of thousand cervical smears.
    Goyarts-Veldstra L; van Driel-Kulker AM; Ploem-Zaaijer JJ; Meyer F; Ploem JS
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():147-60. PubMed ID: 6578401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of machine-selected cells with an image analysis system in normal and abnormal cervical specimens.
    Stenkvist B; Strande G
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Dec; 2(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 2486906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image analysis in cytology: DNA-histogramming versus cervical smear prescreening.
    Bengtsson EW; Nordin B
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1993; 51(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 8338254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A hierarchical neural network assembly for classification of cervical cells in automated screening.
    Mehdi B; Stacey D; Harauz G
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 Oct; 7(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 7848875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The occurrence of isolated dysplastic and carcinoma in situ type cells in cervical smears from patients with dysplasia and carcinoma in situ: significance to prescreening using image processing techniques.
    Feldman M; Poulsen R; Shepherd L; Marshall KG
    Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 4517951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ellipse test for the reduction of false positive signals in automated cytology.
    Tucker JH; Eason P; Stark MH
    Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(5):370-6. PubMed ID: 364906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An image analysing method for automated cytologic prescreening of cervix carcinoma and its prestages: demonstration and preliminary results.
    Kunze KD; Herrmann WR; Meyer W
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1978; 48(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 686977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Image analysis study of squamous epithelial cells in cytological smears of the uterine cervix].
    Bergander S; König R; Geissler U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(16):1039-45. PubMed ID: 2220178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of single-cell classification schemes for computer classification of cervical cells.
    Poulsen RS; Oliver LH; Toussaint GT; Louis C
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Sep; 3(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 7294540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An automated cervical pre-cancerous diagnostic system.
    Mat-Isa NA; Mashor MY; Othman NH
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jan; 42(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17996432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of benign cellular changes in diagnosis of cervical cancer using IR microspectroscopy.
    Romeo MJ; Quinn MA; Burden FR; McNaughton D
    Biopolymers; 2002; 67(4-5):362-6. PubMed ID: 12012467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectral analysis of cervical cells using the discrete Fourier transform.
    Banda-Gamboa H; Ricketts I; Cairns A; Hussein K
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Mar; 5(2):85-102. PubMed ID: 8466852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined malignancy associated change and contextual analysis for computerized classification of cervical cell monolayers.
    Isenstein LM; Zahniser DJ; Hutchinson ML
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Sep; 9(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 7492519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of malignancy-associated changes of the cervical epithelium in a hierarchic classification concept.
    Haroske G; Bergander S; König R; Meyer W
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Apr; 2(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 2275865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical analysis of cell populations in smear and monolayer preparations from the uterine cervix. I. The proportions of isolated, abnormal epithelial cells in slides from one applicator.
    Neugebauer D; Otto K; Soost HJ
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Jun; 3(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 7258858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.