214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35561071)
1. A detailed analysis of expedited regulatory review time of marketing authorization applications for new anticancer drugs in the US and EU.
da Costa Gonçalves F; Demirci E; Zwiers A
Clin Transl Sci; 2022 Aug; 15(8):1959-1967. PubMed ID: 35561071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of regulatory pathways for the approval of advanced therapies in the European Union and the United States.
Iglesias-Lopez C; Obach M; Vallano A; Agustí A
Cytotherapy; 2021 Mar; 23(3):261-274. PubMed ID: 33483292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparative Review of Marketing Authorization Decisions in Switzerland, the EU, and the USA.
Dalla Torre Di Sanguinetto S; Heinonen E; Antonov J; Bolte C
Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Jan; 53(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 29714594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approval probabilities and regulatory review patterns for anticancer drugs in the European Union.
Hartmann M; Mayer-Nicolai C; Pfaff O
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2013 Aug; 87(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 23433721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Decade of Marketing Authorization Applications of Anticancer Drugs in the European Union: An Analysis of Procedural Timelines.
Garsen M; Steenhof M; Zwiers A
Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2021 Jul; 55(4):633-642. PubMed ID: 33543409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulatory approval pathways for anticancer drugs in Japan, the EU and the US.
Nagai S; Ozawa K
Int J Hematol; 2016 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 27084259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.
Salcher-Konrad M; Naci H; Davis C
Milbank Q; 2020 Dec; 98(4):1219-1256. PubMed ID: 33021339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Project Orbis participation by the Swiss regulator on submission gaps, review times, and drug approval decisions between 2020 and 2022: a comparative analysis.
Zosso-Pavic M; Li Q; Atiek E; Wolfer A; Rohr UP
Lancet Oncol; 2024 Jun; 25(6):770-778. PubMed ID: 38754450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration in Granting Accelerated Marketing Authorizations for Covid-19 Medicines and their Utilized Regulations.
Ghadanian M; Schafheutle E
Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2024 Jan; 58(1):79-113. PubMed ID: 37861859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time to Entry for New Cancer Medicines: From European Union-Wide Marketing Authorization to Patient Access in Belgium, Estonia, Scotland, and Sweden.
Ferrario A
Value Health; 2018 Jul; 21(7):809-821. PubMed ID: 30005753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A fresh perspective on comparing the FDA and the CHMP/EMA: approval of antineoplastic tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Shah RR; Roberts SA; Shah DR
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Sep; 76(3):396-411. PubMed ID: 23362829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Similarities and differences in the oncology drug approval process between FDA and European Union with emphasis on in vitro companion diagnostics.
Senderowicz AM; Pfaff O
Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Mar; 20(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 24634467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A decade of marketing approval of gene and cell-based therapies in the United States, European Union and Japan: An evaluation of regulatory decision-making.
Coppens DGM; de Wilde S; Guchelaar HJ; De Bruin ML; Leufkens HGM; Meij P; Hoekman J
Cytotherapy; 2018 Jun; 20(6):769-778. PubMed ID: 29730080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical development and marketing application review times for novel orphan-designated drugs.
Demirci E; Knicley J; Fiorentino L
Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1404922. PubMed ID: 38903827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the new Japanese legislation for expedited approval of regenerative medicine products with the existing systems in the USA and European Union.
Jokura Y; Yano K; Yamato M
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2018 Feb; 12(2):e1056-e1062. PubMed ID: 28211195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulatory Affairs 101: Introduction to Expedited Regulatory Pathways.
Cox EM; Edmund AV; Kratz E; Lockwood SH; Shankar A
Clin Transl Sci; 2020 May; 13(3):451-461. PubMed ID: 31909876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulatory Aspects for Approval of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in the EU.
Fürst-Ladani S; Bührer A; Fürst W; Schober-Ladani N
Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2024; 284():367-387. PubMed ID: 37017789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Real-World Evidence to Support the Registration of a New Osteoporosis Medicinal Product in Europe.
Davenport C; Gravel P; Wang Y; Williams SA; Wieland A; Mitlak B
Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2024 May; 58(3):505-518. PubMed ID: 38341388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Food and Drug Administration vs European Medicines Agency: Review times and clinical evidence on novel drugs at the time of approval.
Joppi R; Bertele V; Vannini T; Garattini S; Banzi R
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Jan; 86(1):170-174. PubMed ID: 31657044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. To what degree are review outcomes aligned for new active substances (NASs) between the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration? A comparison based on publicly available information for NASs initially approved in the time period 2014 to 2016.
Kühler TC; Bujar M; McAuslane N; Liberti L
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e028677. PubMed ID: 31772082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
