187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35562034)
1. Periprosthetic humerus fractures after shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of available classification systems.
Kuhn MZ; King JJ; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Levy JC; Hao KA; Wallace A; Patrick M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2034-2042. PubMed ID: 35562034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of Current Classification Systems for Periprosthetic Fractures of the Humerus.
Auran RL; Tran TL; Dehghan N; McKee MD; Lederman ES
J Orthop Trauma; 2023 Feb; 37(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 36155598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-Observer and Intra-Observer Reliability Assessment of the Established Classification Systems for Periprosthetic Shoulder Fractures.
Wiethölter M; Akgün D; Plachel F; Minkus M; Karczewski D; Braun K; Thiele K; Becker L; Stöckle U; Moroder P
J Clin Med; 2023 Apr; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 37176610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D-printed Handheld Models Do Not Improve Recognition of Specific Characteristics and Patterns of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures.
Spek RWA; Schoolmeesters BJA; Oosterhoff JHF; Doornberg JN; van den Bekerom MPJ; Jaarsma RL; Eygendaal D; IJpma F;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan; 480(1):150-159. PubMed ID: 34427569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Periprosthetic proximal humerus fractures require an individualized treatment approach-results of a multicenter retrospective study.
Boesmueller S; Lorenz G; Kinsky RM; Schallmayer D; Fialka C; Mittermayr R
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38805038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Classification of periprosthetic shoulder fractures].
Kirchhoff C; Kirchhoff S; Biberthaler P
Unfallchirurg; 2016 Apr; 119(4):264-72. PubMed ID: 26992712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and Validity of the Vancouver Classification in Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cementless Femoral Stems.
Lee S; Kagan R; Wang L; Doung YC
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S277-S281. PubMed ID: 30922672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of the Sirveaux Classification of Scapular Notching After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Heckmann ND; McKnight B; Chen XT; Chung BC; Hill JR; Sivasundaram L; Omid R; Hatch GF
Orthopedics; 2022; 45(4):239-243. PubMed ID: 35245139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System for postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished taper-slip stems.
Jain S; Mohrir G; Townsend O; Lamb JN; Palan J; Aderinto J; Pandit H
Bone Joint J; 2021 Aug; 103-B(8):1339-1344. PubMed ID: 34334039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of morphological Mutch classification for greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus: A comparison of x-ray, two-, and three-dimensional CT imaging.
Razaeian S; Askittou S; Wiese B; Zhang D; Harb A; Krettek C; Hawi N
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259646. PubMed ID: 34762694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT.
Bruinsma WE; Guitton TG; Warner JJ; Ring D;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep; 95(17):1600-4. PubMed ID: 24005201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of recategorized Neer classification in differentiating 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented proximal humeral fractures in 116 patients.
Sumrein BO; Mattila VM; Lepola V; Laitinen MK; Launonen AP;
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1756-1761. PubMed ID: 29866397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs.
Bernstein J; Adler LM; Blank JE; Dalsey RM; Williams GR; Iannotti JP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Sep; 78(9):1371-5. PubMed ID: 8816653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
Sidor ML; Zuckerman JD; Lyon T; Koval K; Cuomo F; Schoenberg N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1993 Dec; 75(12):1745-50. PubMed ID: 8258543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Humeral Bone Loss in Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: the Proximal Humeral Arthroplasty Revision Osseous inSufficiency (PHAROS) Classification System.
Chalmers PN; Romeo AA; Nicholson GP; Boileau P; Keener JD; Gregory JM; Salazar DH; Tashjian RZ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):432-441. PubMed ID: 30601321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter- and intraobserver agreement of three classification systems for lateral clavicle fractures - reliability comparison between two specialist groups.
Rauer T; Boos M; Neuhaus V; Ellanti P; Kaufmann RA; Pape HC; Allemann F
Patient Saf Surg; 2020; 14():4. PubMed ID: 31911821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reliability and validity of the modified Unified Classification System for periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.
Fan MQ; Fan XH; Chen XL; Shen JJ; Jiang XJ; Li XS; Huang JF
J Orthop Sci; 2021 May; 26(3):385-388. PubMed ID: 32229162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Type A Fracture.
Saltzman BM; Leroux T; Collins MJ; Arns TA; Forsythe B
Orthopedics; 2017 Jul; 40(4):e721-e724. PubMed ID: 28399323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the Modified Gartland Classification Clarify Decision Making?
Leung S; Paryavi E; Herman MJ; Sponseller PD; Abzug JM
J Pediatr Orthop; 2018 Jan; 38(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 26974527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
