297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35562659)
21. Inferring trait-specific similarity among individuals from molecular markers and phenotypes with Bayesian regression.
Gianola D; Fernando RL; Schön CC
Theor Popul Biol; 2020 Apr; 132():47-59. PubMed ID: 31830483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A hybrid bayesian approach for genome-wide association studies on related individuals.
Yazdani A; Dunson DB
Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 31(24):3890-6. PubMed ID: 26323717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficient weighting methods for genomic best linear-unbiased prediction (BLUP) adapted to the genetic architectures of quantitative traits.
Ren D; An L; Li B; Qiao L; Liu W
Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Feb; 126(2):320-334. PubMed ID: 32980863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of genomic prediction of maternal traits in pigs using Bayesian variable selection methods.
Kjetså MV; Gjuvsland AB; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek E; Meuwissen T
J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 Nov; 139(6):654-665. PubMed ID: 35758628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.
Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accounting for overlapping annotations in genomic prediction models of complex traits.
Mollandin F; Gilbert H; Croiseau P; Rau A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 23(1):365. PubMed ID: 36068513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bayesian meta-analysis models for cross cancer genomic investigation of pleiotropic effects using group structure.
Baghfalaki T; Sugier PE; Truong T; Pettitt AN; Mengersen K; Liquet B
Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(6):1498-1518. PubMed ID: 33368447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Genomic dissection and prediction of feed intake and residual feed intake traits using a longitudinal model in F2 chickens.
Emamgholi Begli H; Vaez Torshizi R; Masoudi AA; Ehsani A; Jensen J
Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1792-1798. PubMed ID: 29268803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Toward integration of genomic selection with crop modelling: the development of an integrated approach to predicting rice heading dates.
Onogi A; Watanabe M; Mochizuki T; Hayashi T; Nakagawa H; Hasegawa T; Iwata H
Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Apr; 129(4):805-817. PubMed ID: 26791836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle.
Neves HH; Carvalheiro R; O'Brien AM; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Schenkel FS; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Cole JB; da Silva MV; Queiroz SA; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):17. PubMed ID: 24575732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses.
Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):50. PubMed ID: 25253441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Structured Genome-Wide Association Studies with Bayesian Hierarchical Variable Selection.
Zhao Y; Zhu H; Lu Z; Knickmeyer RC; Zou F
Genetics; 2019 Jun; 212(2):397-415. PubMed ID: 31010934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Application of a Bayesian non-linear model hybrid scheme to sequence data for genomic prediction and QTL mapping.
Wang T; Chen YP; MacLeod IM; Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
BMC Genomics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):618. PubMed ID: 28810831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction.
Brøndum RF; Su G; Janss L; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Boichard D; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4107-16. PubMed ID: 25892697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Variational Bayes Genomic-Enabled Prediction Model with Genotype × Environment Interaction.
Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J; Montesinos-López JC; Luna-Vázquez FJ; Salinas-Ruiz J; Herrera-Morales JR; Buenrostro-Mariscal R
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jun; 7(6):1833-1853. PubMed ID: 28391241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
