These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35563967)

  • 41. Selected food items adulteration, their impacts on public health, and detection methods: A review.
    Haji A; Desalegn K; Hassen H
    Food Sci Nutr; 2023 Dec; 11(12):7534-7545. PubMed ID: 38107123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Defining the Public Health Threat of Dietary Supplement Fraud.
    Wheatley VM; Spink J
    Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf; 2013 Nov; 12(6):599-613. PubMed ID: 33412717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Risk based meat hygiene--examples on food chain information and visual meat inspection.
    Ellerbroek L
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2007 Aug; 114(8):299-304. PubMed ID: 17763631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Future role of the official veterinarian at the ante- and post-mortem inspection].
    Kühne M; Lhafi SK
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006 Feb; 113(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 16555487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A semantic rule based digital fraud detection.
    Ahmed M; Ansar K; Muckley CB; Khan A; Anjum A; Talha M
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e649. PubMed ID: 34435097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Review of Recent DNA-Based Methods for Main Food-Authentication Topics.
    Böhme K; Calo-Mata P; Barros-Velázquez J; Ortea I
    J Agric Food Chem; 2019 Apr; 67(14):3854-3864. PubMed ID: 30901215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Food fraud and mitigating strategies of UK food supply chain during COVID-19.
    Soon-Sinclair JM; Nyarugwe S; Jack L
    Food Control; 2023 Jun; 148():109670. PubMed ID: 36748095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Food forensics: Techniques for authenticity determination of food products.
    Saadat S; Pandya H; Dey A; Rawtani D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111243. PubMed ID: 35240505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Food inauthenticity: Authority activities, guidance for food operators, and mitigation tools.
    Popping B; Buck N; Bánáti D; Brereton P; Gendel S; Hristozova N; Chaves SM; Saner S; Spink J; Willis C; Wunderlin D
    Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf; 2022 Nov; 21(6):4776-4811. PubMed ID: 36254736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. When detection of dairy food fraud fails: An alternative approach through proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
    Hanganu A; Chira NA
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Aug; 104(8):8454-8466. PubMed ID: 33934861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Undeclared (Poly)phosphates Detection in Food of Animal Origin as a Potential Tool toward Fraud Prevention.
    Pavlovic R; Di Cesare F; Longo F; Abballe F; Panseri S; Bonanni RC; Baccelliere R; Neri B; Chiesa LM
    Foods; 2021 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 34359417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Smartphone-based competitive immunoassay for quantitative on-site detection of meat adulteration.
    Seddaoui N; Amine A
    Talanta; 2021 Aug; 230():122346. PubMed ID: 33934795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Consumer Knowledge about Food Labeling and Fraud.
    Moreira MJ; García-Díez J; de Almeida JMMM; Saraiva C
    Foods; 2021 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 34063359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Study and identification of adulteration of citrus fruit juices].
    Richard JP; Coursin D
    Ann Nutr Aliment; 1978; 32(5):1021-33. PubMed ID: 754577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Commodities consumed in Italy, Greece and other Mediterranean countries compared with Australia in 1960s and 1990s.
    Noah A; Truswell S
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2003; 12(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12737007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Hazard analysis and critical control point systems in the United States Department of Agriculture regulatory policy.
    Billy TJ; Wachsmuth IK
    Rev Sci Tech; 1997 Aug; 16(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 9501347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Summary of the AOAC-Sponsored Workshop Series Related to the Global Understanding of Food Fraud (GUFF): Mobilization of Resources for Food Authenticity Assurance and Food Fraud Prevention and Mitigation.
    Godefroy SB; Barrere V; Théolier J; Baker RC; Zhang G; Hamilton M; Pellegrino M; Byrne P; Ben Embarek P
    J AOAC Int; 2020 Apr; 103(2):470-479. PubMed ID: 33241276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An epidemiological analysis of equine welfare data from regulatory inspections by the official competent authorities.
    Hitchens PL; Hultgren J; Frössling J; Emanuelson U; Keeling LJ
    Animal; 2017 Jul; 11(7):1237-1248. PubMed ID: 27931268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Whose fault is it? Fraud scandal in the milk industry and its impact on product image and consumption - The case of Brazil.
    Breitenbach R; Rodrigues H; Brandão JB
    Food Res Int; 2018 Jun; 108():475-481. PubMed ID: 29735081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effectiveness of a 95 SNP panel for the screening of breed label fraud in the Chinese meat market.
    Rogberg-Muñoz A; Wei S; Ripoli MV; Guo BL; Carino MH; Lirón JP; Prando AJ; Vaca RJ; Peral-García P; Wei YM; Giovambattista G
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jan; 111():47-52. PubMed ID: 26334371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.