These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35564370)

  • 41. Spatial autocorrelation, influencing factors and temporal distribution of the construction and demolition waste disposal industry.
    Wang H; Pan X; Zhang S
    Waste Manag; 2021 May; 127():158-167. PubMed ID: 33945935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Economic benefit analysis of the carbon potential of construction waste resource management based on a simulation of carbon trading policy.
    Liu J; Li J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(36):85986-86009. PubMed ID: 37395881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pricing Strategies in Dual-Channel Reverse Supply Chains Considering Fairness Concern.
    Wu D; Chen J; Yan R; Zhang R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 May; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 31086035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A multi-stakeholder digital platform for regional construction and demolition waste management.
    Barakat B; Srour I
    Waste Manag Res; 2024 Feb; 42(2):178-188. PubMed ID: 37246618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Business models for the reuse of construction and demolition waste.
    Buchard MV; Christensen TB
    Waste Manag Res; 2024 May; 42(5):359-371. PubMed ID: 37519293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Investigating the determinants of contractor's construction and demolition waste management behavior in Mainland China.
    Wu Z; Yu ATW; Shen L
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():290-300. PubMed ID: 27613414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Recommendations for the management of construction and demolition waste in treatment plants.
    Barbudo A; Ayuso J; Lozano A; Cabrera M; López-Uceda A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 31154639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluating the effects of policies on building construction waste management: a hybrid dynamic approach.
    Ding Z; Sun Z; Liu R; Xu X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(25):67378-67397. PubMed ID: 37103696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of construction and demolition waste management between Brazil, European Union and USA.
    Nunes K; Mahler CF
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Apr; 38(4):415-422. PubMed ID: 32043421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Risk sharing for PPP project in construction waste recycling industry in China.
    Liu J; Hua Z; Pang Y; Wang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(9):12614-12628. PubMed ID: 34402006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluating carbon emissions of China's waste management strategies for building refurbishment projects: contributing to a circular economy.
    Ma W; Hao JL; Zhang C; Di Sarno L; Mannis A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(4):8657-8671. PubMed ID: 35064493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reclamation chain of waste concrete: A case study of Shanghai.
    Xiao J; Ma Z; Ding T
    Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():334-343. PubMed ID: 26452425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 2: SRF produced from construction and demolition waste.
    Nasrullah M; Vainikka P; Hannula J; Hurme M; Kärki J
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25074716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Environmental and economic advantages of adopting reverse logistics for recycling construction and demolition waste: A case study of Brazilian construction and recycling companies.
    Oliveira Neto GC; Correia JM
    Waste Manag Res; 2019 Feb; 37(2):176-185. PubMed ID: 30632935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of recycled concrete aggregates for their suitability in construction activities: An experimental study.
    Puthussery JV; Kumar R; Garg A
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():270-276. PubMed ID: 27353393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Overview regarding construction and demolition waste in Spain.
    Rodríguez-Robles D; García-González J; Juan-Valdés A; Morán-Del Pozo JM; Guerra-Romero MI
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(23):3060-70. PubMed ID: 25230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An analytical framework of "zero waste construction site": Two case studies of Shenzhen, China.
    Lu W; Bao Z; Lee WMW; Chi B; Wang J
    Waste Manag; 2021 Feb; 121():343-353. PubMed ID: 33418446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clean construction and demolition waste material cycles through optimised pre-demolition waste audit documentation: A review on building material assessment tools.
    Rašković M; Ragossnig AM; Kondracki K; Ragossnig-Angst M
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):923-941. PubMed ID: 32635832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Characterizing the environmental impact of metals in construction and demolition waste.
    Yu D; Duan H; Song Q; Li X; Zhang H; Zhang H; Liu Y; Shen W; Wang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 May; 25(14):13823-13832. PubMed ID: 29508202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Building a whole process policy framework promoting construction and demolition waste utilization in China.
    Wang Q; Jiang T; Liu L; Zhang S; Kildunne A; Miao Z
    Waste Manag Res; 2023 Apr; 41(4):914-923. PubMed ID: 36245415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.