These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3556497)

  • 1. Effects of low pass filtering on the brainstem auditory evoked potential in the rat.
    Shaw NA
    Exp Brain Res; 1987; 65(3):686-90. PubMed ID: 3556497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The brainstem auditory evoked potential: effects of high frequency filtering.
    Shaw NA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 2351091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of low-pass filtering on the primary cortical auditory potential of the rat.
    Shaw NA
    J Neurosci Methods; 1995 Jul; 59(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 8531489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of high-pass filter frequency and slope on BAEP amplitude, latency and wave form.
    Elton M; Scherg M; Von Cramon D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 May; 57(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 6201344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of high-pass filtering on the detection of the auditory brainstem response.
    Mason SM
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Aug; 18(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 6487849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: a comparison of two high-frequency filter settings.
    Cacace AT; Shy M; Satya-Murti S
    Neurology; 1980 Jul; 30(7 Pt 1):765-7. PubMed ID: 7190242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of analog filtering on brain stem auditory-evoked potentials in dogs.
    Kawasaki Y; Inada S
    Am J Vet Res; 1992 Jul; 53(7):1096-100. PubMed ID: 1497176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The temporal relationship between the brainstem and primary cortical auditory evoked potentials.
    Shaw NA
    Prog Neurobiol; 1995 Oct; 47(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 8711132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A possible collicular component of the auditory evoked potential and its relationship to brainstem and cerebellar auditory potentials.
    Shaw NA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Dec; 32(12):579-90. PubMed ID: 1493771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 7280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of low-pass filtering on the flash visual evoked potential of the albino rat.
    Shaw NA
    J Neurosci Methods; 1992 Sep; 44(2-3):233-40. PubMed ID: 1474855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postnatal development of the brainstem auditory evoked potential and far-field cochlear microphonic in non-sedated rat pups.
    Church MW; Williams HL; Holloway JA
    Brain Res; 1984 May; 316(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 6733535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of inferior colliculus activity to the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in mice.
    Land R; Burghard A; Kral A
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():109-118. PubMed ID: 27562195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in the rat: effects of gender, stimulus characteristics and ethanol sedation.
    Church MW; Williams HL; Holloway JA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Jul; 59(4):328-39. PubMed ID: 6203722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. BAEP subcomponents and wave form--relation to click phase and stimulus rate.
    Sand T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Jan; 65(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 2416548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of stimulus repetition rate on slow and fast components of auditory brain-stem responses.
    Suzuki T; Kobayashi K; Takagi N
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Mar; 65(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 2419104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus duration and waves of auditory brainstem response.
    Funasaka S; Ito S
    Audiology; 1986; 25(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 3753306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analog and digital filtering of the brain stem auditory evoked response.
    Kavanagh KT; Franks R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):508-14. PubMed ID: 2751210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of low pass filtering on central somatosensory conduction time.
    Shaw NA
    Brain Res Bull; 1992 May; 28(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 1617464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.