138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35566521)
21. Single-leg-stance (flamingo) radiographs to assess pelvic instability: how much motion is normal?
Garras DN; Carothers JT; Olson SA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2114-8. PubMed ID: 18829908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A retrospective study of SPECT/CT scans using SUV measurement of the normal pelvis with Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate.
Wang R; Duan X; Shen C; Han D; Ma J; Wu H; Xu X; Qin T; Fan Q; Zhang Z; Shi W; Guo Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(6):895-908. PubMed ID: 30103368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breech progression angle: new feasible and reliable transperineal ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal breech descent in birth canal.
Youssef A; Brunelli E; Fiorentini M; Lenzi J; Pilu G; El-Balat A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 58(4):609-615. PubMed ID: 33847431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of acetabular version angle measurements between prone and reformatted supine computed tomography images.
Chong le R; Too CW
Skeletal Radiol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 24337490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can CT replace MRI in preoperative assessment of the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer?
Maizlin ZV; Brown JA; So G; Brown C; Phang TP; Walker ML; Kirby JM; Vora P; Tiwari P
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Mar; 53(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 20173478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracies in Measuring Spinopelvic Parameters in Full-Spine Lateral Standing Radiograph.
Yamada K; Aota Y; Higashi T; Ishida K; Nimura T; Saito T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(11):E640-6. PubMed ID: 25816139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement, reproducibility, and accuracy of computed tomographic measurements of pituitary gland dimensions in healthy dogs.
van der Vlugt-Meijer RH; Meij BP; Voorhout G
Am J Vet Res; 2006 Oct; 67(10):1750-5. PubMed ID: 17014327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlation of patient age with CT-measured aorta-sacral promontory distance.
Agrawal A; Abayazeed A; Francis SL; Tolentino J; Ostergard DR; Seow A; Van Bogaert E; Rose T; Deveneau NE; Azadi A
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jun; 26(6):887-91. PubMed ID: 25634664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pelvic incidence: a fixed value or can you change it?
Place HM; Hayes AM; Huebner SB; Hayden AM; Israel H; Brechbuhler JL
Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1565-1569. PubMed ID: 28669858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis : a new sign for acetabular retroversion.
Kalberer F; Sierra RJ; Madan SS; Ganz R; Leunig M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 466(3):677-83. PubMed ID: 18264856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Test-retest repeatability of lumbar sagittal alignment and disc height measurements with or without axial loading: a computed tomography study.
Hioki A; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K; Inoue N
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Apr; 24(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 21430497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision].
Yan HH; Lou Z; Sheng J; Zhang W; Fu CG; Meng RG
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):846-50. PubMed ID: 22116717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of powers ratio for assessment of atlanto-occipital junction: comparison of plain radiography and computed tomography.
Li G; Passias P; Kozanek M; Shannon BD; Li G; Villamil F; Bono CM; Harris M; Wood KB
Eur Spine J; 2009 Apr; 18(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 19165510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multidetector-row CT angiography diagnostic sensitivity in evaluation of renal artery stenosis: comparison between multiple reconstruction techniques.
Saba L; Caddeo G; Sanfilippo R; Montisci R; Mallarini G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):712-6. PubMed ID: 17895781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Agreement and repeatability of linear vertebral body and canal measurements using computed tomography (CT) and low field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
De Decker S; Gielen IM; Duchateau L; Polis I; Van Bree HJ; Van Ham LM
Vet Surg; 2010 Jan; 39(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 20210941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. CT-based measurement of the inner pelvic volume.
Kaufmann D; Lauscher JC; Gröne J; Zur Hausen G; Kreis ME; Hamm B; Niehues SM
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):218-223. PubMed ID: 26966146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of iterative reconstruction on variability and reproducibility of epicardial fat volume quantification by cardiac CT.
Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Yuki H; Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Takaoka H; Matsumura M; Katahira K; Noda K; Oshima S; Tokuyasu S; Yamashita Y
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 26560351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of crown height of the maxillary first molar tooth to approximate the age of horses.
Carmalt JL; Henderson KV; Rawlinson JE; Waldner CL
Am J Vet Res; 2018 Aug; 79(8):867-873. PubMed ID: 30058851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiation dose reduction for musculoskeletal computed tomography of the pelvis with preserved image quality.
Zabak E; Omar H; Boothe E; Tenorio L; Guild J; Abbara S; Chhabra A
Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):375-385. PubMed ID: 30155628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
