174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35566741)
1. Port Placement Strategies for Robotic Pulmonary Lobectomy: A Narrative Review.
Parini S; Massera F; Papalia E; Baietto G; Bora G; Rena O
J Clin Med; 2022 May; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35566741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Port Strategies for Robot-Assisted Lobectomy by High-Volume Thoracic Surgeons: A Nationwide Survey.
Oh DS; Tisol WB; Cesnik L; Crosby A; Cerfolio RJ
Innovations (Phila); 2019; 14(6):545-552. PubMed ID: 31739719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections.
Rocco G; Internullo E; Cassivi SD; Van Raemdonck D; Ferguson MK
Thorac Surg Clin; 2008 Aug; 18(3):235-47. PubMed ID: 18831498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New Technique for Introducing a Surgical Stapler during Robot-Assisted Lobectomy for Lung Cancer.
Usuda J; Inoue T; Sonokawa T; Matsumoto M; Enomoto Y; Suzuki K; Tomioka Y
J Nippon Med Sch; 2022 May; 89(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 34526458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Lee JH; Hong JI; Kim HK
J Chest Surg; 2021 Aug; 54(4):266-278. PubMed ID: 34353967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (Premier).
Swanson SJ; Miller DL; McKenna RJ; Howington J; Marshall MB; Yoo AC; Moore M; Gunnarsson CL; Meyers BF
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Mar; 147(3):929-37. PubMed ID: 24210834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: results and operating technique.
Veronesi G
J Thorac Dis; 2015 Apr; 7(Suppl 2):S122-30. PubMed ID: 25984357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages?
Lee BE; Korst RJ; Kletsman E; Rutledge JR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):724-9. PubMed ID: 24252937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic surgery for lung resections-total port approach: advantages and disadvantages.
Ramadan OI; Wei B; Cerfolio RJ
J Vis Surg; 2017; 3():22. PubMed ID: 29078585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning curve in robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer is not steep after experience in video-assisted lobectomy; single-surgeon experience using cumulative sum analysis.
Andersson SE; Ilonen IK; Pälli OH; Salo JA; Räsänen JV
Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2021; 27():100362. PubMed ID: 33838571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standardizing Robotic Lobectomy: Feasibility and Safety in 128 Consecutive Lobectomies Within a Single Healthcare System.
Lazar JF; Spier LN; Hartman AR; Lazzaro RS
Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 28338551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic lobectomy.
Linsky P; Wei B
J Vis Surg; 2017; 3():132. PubMed ID: 29078692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective comparative cohort study on the efficacy and safety of bi-port robotic-assisted lobectomy and multi-port robotic-assisted lobectomy.
Gu Z; Huang J; Tian Y; Jiang L; Luo Q
J Thorac Dis; 2022 Aug; 14(8):2970-2976. PubMed ID: 36071757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Techniques for lung surgery: a review of robotic lobectomy.
Chen S; Geraci TC; Cerfolio RJ
Expert Rev Respir Med; 2018 Apr; 12(4):315-322. PubMed ID: 29504417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Review.
Brooks P
AORN J; 2015 Jul; 102(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 26119608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives.
Lee JL; Alsaleem HA; Kim JC
Ann Surg Treat Res; 2020 Jan; 98(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 31909048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of prior multiport experience on the learning curve for single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy: a multicentre comparative study†.
Martin-Ucar AE; Aragon J; Bolufer Nadal S; Galvez Munoz C; Luo Q; Perez Mendez I; Sihoe ADL; Socci L
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Jun; 51(6):1183-1187. PubMed ID: 28204171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic lobectomy: flattening the learning curve.
Hernandez JM; Humphries LA; Keeling WB; Golkar F; Dimou F; Garrett J; Sommers KE
J Robot Surg; 2012 Mar; 6(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 27637978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pulmonary lobectomy for cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic approach.
Aiolfi A; Nosotti M; Micheletto G; Khor D; Bonitta G; Perali C; Marin J; Biraghi T; Bona D
Surgery; 2021 Feb; 169(2):436-446. PubMed ID: 33097244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal Approach to Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ng CSH; MacDonald JK; Gilbert S; Khan AZ; Kim YT; Louie BE; Blair Marshall M; Santos RS; Scarci M; Shargal Y; Fernando HC
Innovations (Phila); 2019 Apr; 14(2):90-116. PubMed ID: 31039680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
