158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35567421)
1. Contribution of Verbal Learning & Memory and Spectro-Temporal Discrimination to Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
Harris MS; Hamel BL; Wichert K; Kozlowski K; Mleziva S; Ray C; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Moberly AC
Laryngoscope; 2023 Mar; 133(3):661-669. PubMed ID: 35567421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Verbal Learning and Memory After Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults: Some New Findings with the CVLT-II.
Pisoni DB; Broadstock A; Wucinich T; Safdar N; Miller K; Hernandez LR; Vasil K; Boyce L; Davies A; Harris MS; Castellanos I; Xu H; Kronenberger WG; Moberly AC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):720-745. PubMed ID: 29271831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Verbal Learning and Memory in Early-Implanted, Prelingually Deaf Adolescent and Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Chandramouli SH; Kronenberger WG; Pisoni DB
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1033-1050. PubMed ID: 30986141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
Tamati TN; Ray C; Vasil KJ; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Vasil K; Wucinich T; Pisoni DB; Baxter J; Ray C; Shafiro V
Laryngoscope; 2018 Apr; 128(4):959-966. PubMed ID: 28776711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Word and Nonword Reading Efficiency in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Tamati TN; Vasil KJ; Kronenberger WG; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC; Ray C
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Mar; 42(3):e272-e278. PubMed ID: 33306660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative Visual Measures of Verbal Learning and Memory and their Relations to Speech Recognition After Cochlear Implantation.
Ray C; Pisoni DB; Lu E; Kronenberger WG; Moberly AC
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):993-1002. PubMed ID: 35319518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Two Spectro-Temporal Ripple Tests and Their Relation to the Matrix Speech-in-Noise Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
van Groesen NRA; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1221-1228. PubMed ID: 37046376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Verbal learning and memory in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.
Kronenberger WG; Henning SC; Ditmars AM; Roman AS; Pisoni DB
Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):746-754. PubMed ID: 29933710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
Capretta NR; Moberly AC
Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
Kirby BJ; Spratford M; Klein KE; McCreery RW
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):645-650. PubMed ID: 30130295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bottom-Up Signal Quality Impacts the Role of Top-Down Cognitive-Linguistic Processing During Speech Recognition by Adults with Cochlear Implants.
Moberly AC; Lewis JH; Vasil KJ; Ray C; Tamati TN
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Dec; 42(10S):S33-S41. PubMed ID: 34766942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic Current Focusing Compared to Monopolar Stimulation in a Take-Home Trial of Cochlear Implant Users.
van Groesen NRA; Briaire JJ; de Jong MAM; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 36279119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative Reading Efficiency as a Predictor of Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes.
Moberly AC; Afreen H; Schneider KJ; Tamati TN
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1100-e1106. PubMed ID: 36351224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.
Lawler M; Yu J; Aronoff JM
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):760-766. PubMed ID: 28957975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
