These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35567421)

  • 1. Contribution of Verbal Learning & Memory and Spectro-Temporal Discrimination to Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Harris MS; Hamel BL; Wichert K; Kozlowski K; Mleziva S; Ray C; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Moberly AC
    Laryngoscope; 2023 Mar; 133(3):661-669. PubMed ID: 35567421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Verbal Learning and Memory After Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults: Some New Findings with the CVLT-II.
    Pisoni DB; Broadstock A; Wucinich T; Safdar N; Miller K; Hernandez LR; Vasil K; Boyce L; Davies A; Harris MS; Castellanos I; Xu H; Kronenberger WG; Moberly AC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):720-745. PubMed ID: 29271831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verbal Learning and Memory in Early-Implanted, Prelingually Deaf Adolescent and Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Chandramouli SH; Kronenberger WG; Pisoni DB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1033-1050. PubMed ID: 30986141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
    Tamati TN; Ray C; Vasil KJ; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
    Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Vasil K; Wucinich T; Pisoni DB; Baxter J; Ray C; Shafiro V
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Apr; 128(4):959-966. PubMed ID: 28776711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word and Nonword Reading Efficiency in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tamati TN; Vasil KJ; Kronenberger WG; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC; Ray C
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Mar; 42(3):e272-e278. PubMed ID: 33306660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preoperative Visual Measures of Verbal Learning and Memory and their Relations to Speech Recognition After Cochlear Implantation.
    Ray C; Pisoni DB; Lu E; Kronenberger WG; Moberly AC
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):993-1002. PubMed ID: 35319518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Two Spectro-Temporal Ripple Tests and Their Relation to the Matrix Speech-in-Noise Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    van Groesen NRA; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1221-1228. PubMed ID: 37046376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verbal learning and memory in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.
    Kronenberger WG; Henning SC; Ditmars AM; Roman AS; Pisoni DB
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):746-754. PubMed ID: 29933710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
    Capretta NR; Moberly AC
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Kirby BJ; Spratford M; Klein KE; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):645-650. PubMed ID: 30130295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bottom-Up Signal Quality Impacts the Role of Top-Down Cognitive-Linguistic Processing During Speech Recognition by Adults with Cochlear Implants.
    Moberly AC; Lewis JH; Vasil KJ; Ray C; Tamati TN
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Dec; 42(10S):S33-S41. PubMed ID: 34766942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic Current Focusing Compared to Monopolar Stimulation in a Take-Home Trial of Cochlear Implant Users.
    van Groesen NRA; Briaire JJ; de Jong MAM; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 36279119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative Reading Efficiency as a Predictor of Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes.
    Moberly AC; Afreen H; Schneider KJ; Tamati TN
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1100-e1106. PubMed ID: 36351224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Lawler M; Yu J; Aronoff JM
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):760-766. PubMed ID: 28957975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.