These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
64. Recognizing Voices Through a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review of Voice Perception, Talker Discrimination, and Talker Identification. Colby S; Orena AJ J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):3165-3194. PubMed ID: 35926089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Age-Related Performance on Vowel Identification and the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants. DiNino M; Arenberg JG Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518770959. PubMed ID: 29708065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Association of Self-Reported Coping Strategies With Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Espahbodi M; Harvey E; Livingston AJ; Montagne W; Kozlowski K; Jensen J; Liu X; Juan W; Tarima S; Rusch M; Harris MS Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep; 43(8):e888-e894. PubMed ID: 35970167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users With Prolonged Recovery From Neural Adaptation at the Level of the Auditory Nerve Tend to Have Poorer Speech Perception Performance. He S; Skidmore J; Carter BL; Lemeshow S; Sun S Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 35652833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Speech recognition and quality of life outcomes of adults with cochlear implants following a quarter-century of deafness: what should be the maximum duration? Atak HBO; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Nov; 280(11):4903-4913. PubMed ID: 37672104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity". Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners. O'Neill ER; Parke MN; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1224. PubMed ID: 33639827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Cortical reorganization in postlingually deaf cochlear implant users: Intra-modal and cross-modal considerations. Stropahl M; Chen LC; Debener S Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():128-137. PubMed ID: 27473503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Auditory and verbal memory predictors of spoken language skills in children with cochlear implants. de Hoog BE; Langereis MC; van Weerdenburg M; Keuning J; Knoors H; Verhoeven L Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Oct; 57():112-24. PubMed ID: 27414061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. "Product" Versus "Process" Measures in Assessing Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants. Moberly AC; Castellanos I; Vasil KJ; Adunka OF; Pisoni DB Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):e195-e202. PubMed ID: 29342056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation. Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Oakley S; Gantz BJ; Noble W Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):352-9. PubMed ID: 18453885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users. Li T; Fu QJ Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Benefits of simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation on verbal reasoning skills in prelingually deaf children. Jacobs E; Langereis MC; Frijns JH; Free RH; Goedegebure A; Smits C; Stokroos RJ; Ariens-Meijer SA; Mylanus EA; Vermeulen AM Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Nov; 58():104-13. PubMed ID: 27608372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Relationships Between the Auditory Nerve Sensitivity to Amplitude Modulation, Perceptual Amplitude Modulation Rate Discrimination Sensitivity, and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users. He S; Skidmore J; Koch B; Chatterjee M; Carter BL; Yuan Y Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):371-384. PubMed ID: 36342278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Association of Patient-Related Factors With Adult Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. Zhao EE; Dornhoffer JR; Loftus C; Nguyen SA; Meyer TA; Dubno JR; McRackan TR JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Jul; 146(7):613-620. PubMed ID: 32407461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]