These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35567493)

  • 1. Probing combinational influence of design variables on bone biomechanical response around dental implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
    Chakraborty A; Datta P; Kumar CS; Majumder S; Roychowdhury A
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Oct; 110(10):2338-2352. PubMed ID: 35567493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of diameter, length and elastic modulus of a dental implant on stress and strain levels in peri-implant bone: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Robau-Porrua A; Pérez-Rodríguez Y; Soris-Rodríguez LM; Pérez-Acosta O; González JE
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 30(5-6):541-558. PubMed ID: 31903978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design of patient specific basal dental implant using Finite Element method and Artificial Neural Network technique.
    Choudhury S; Rana M; Chakraborty A; Majumder S; Roy S; RoyChowdhury A; Datta S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Sep; 236(9):1375-1387. PubMed ID: 35880901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical analysis of alveolar bone stress around implants with different thread designs and pitches in the mandibular molar area.
    Lan TH; Du JK; Pan CY; Lee HE; Chung WH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Apr; 16(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 21301903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probing the Influence of Hybrid Thread Design on Biomechanical Response of Dental Implants: Finite Element Study and Experimental Validation.
    Chakraborty A; Sahare KD; Datta P; Majumder S; Roychowdhury A; Basu B
    J Biomech Eng; 2023 Jan; 145(1):. PubMed ID: 35838340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants based on platform-switching concept: influence of diameter, length, thread shape, and in-bone positioning depth on stress-based performance.
    Baggi L; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G; Sannino G
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():250929. PubMed ID: 23861722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.
    Mosavar A; Ziaei A; Kadkhodaei M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1317-26. PubMed ID: 26478976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis.
    Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Huang HL; Chen MY; Shen YW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e64-71. PubMed ID: 23527370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
    Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis of peri-prosthetic bone response to hybrid threaded zirconia dental implants: An in silico model.
    Mishra D; Basu B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106310. PubMed ID: 38128471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of strain at the terminal abutment site of a fixed mandibular implant prosthesis during cantilever loading.
    Rodriguez AM; Aquilino SA; Lund PS; Ryther JS; Southard TE
    J Prosthodont; 1993 Jun; 2(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 8242172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A 3-D Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution on Implant-supported Fixed Prosthesis with Four Different Commercially Available Implant Systems.
    Tyagi R; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Malethia A; Saini N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):835-840. PubMed ID: 33568601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs.
    Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparative Analysis on Two Types of Oral Implants, Bone-Level and Tissue-Level, with Different Cantilever Lengths of Fixed Prosthesis.
    Mosavar A; Nili M; Hashemi SR; Kadkhodaei M
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 26(4):289-295. PubMed ID: 26662575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.