130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35568608)
21. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Whipple Resection: Concordance Between Frozen Section And Permanent Section Diagnosis Of Surgical Margins.
Bilal M; Tariq H; Mamoon N
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2018; 30(1):26-29. PubMed ID: 29504324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surgeon performed continuous intraoperative ultrasound guidance decreases re-excisions and mastectomy rates in breast cancer.
Karadeniz Cakmak G; Emre AU; Tascilar O; Bahadir B; Ozkan S
Breast; 2017 Jun; 33():23-28. PubMed ID: 28273552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of frozen section in the intra-operative margin assessment during breast conserving surgery.
Anila KR; Chandramohan K; Mathews A; Somanathan T; Jayasree K
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(2):235-238. PubMed ID: 28071617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of frozen-section analysis of sentinel lymph node and lumpectomy margin status on reoperation rates in patients undergoing breast-conservation therapy.
McLaughlin SA; Ochoa-Frongia LM; Patil SM; Cody HS; Sclafani LM
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jan; 206(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 18155571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors that influence the incidence of microscopic carcinoma in frozen and preserved specimens from patients with breast carcinoma after breast-conserving surgery.
Kim R; Osaki A; Kaneko M; Inai K; Toge T
Oncol Rep; 2003; 10(5):1321-8. PubMed ID: 12883701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How accurate is frozen section pathology compared to permanent pathology in detecting involved margins and lymph nodes in breast cancer?
Namdar ZM; Omidifar N; Arasteh P; Akrami M; Tahmasebi S; Nobandegani AS; Sedighi S; Zangouri V; Talei A
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 19(1):261. PubMed ID: 34470649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Usefulness of Intraoperative Circumferential Frozen-Section Analysis of Lumpectomy Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Ko S; Chun YK; Kang SS; Hur MH
J Breast Cancer; 2017 Jun; 20(2):176-182. PubMed ID: 28690654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Frozen section is not cost beneficial for the assessment of margins in oral cancer.
Datta S; Mishra A; Chaturvedi P; Bal M; Nair D; More Y; Ingole P; Sawakare S; Agarwal JP; Kane SV; Joshi P; Nair S; D'Cruz A
Indian J Cancer; 2019; 56(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30950438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Feasibility of Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging for Direct Assessment of Surgical Resection Margins During Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Janssen NNY; van Seijen M; Loo CE; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Hankel T; Sonke JJ; Nijkamp J
J Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 241():160-169. PubMed ID: 31026794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.
Camp ER; McAuliffe PF; Gilroy JS; Morris CG; Lind DS; Mendenhall NP; Copeland EM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16310688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association of surgical margins with local recurrence in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Lin J; Lin KJ; Wang YF; Huang LH; Chen SL; Chen DR
BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):451. PubMed ID: 32434493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Reliability of sub-areolar sampling and frozen section in predicting occult nipple involvement in breast cancer patients.
D'Alonzo M; Pecchio S; Campisi P; De Rosa G; Bounous VE; Villasco A; Balocco P; Biglia N
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1736-1742. PubMed ID: 30100362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review.
Esbona K; Li Z; Wilke LG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3236-45. PubMed ID: 22847119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pathologic Assessment of Surgical Margins on Frozen and Permanent Sections in Breast Conserving Surgery.
Noguchi M; Minami M; Earashi M; Taniya T; Miyazaki I; Mizukami Y; Nonomura A; Nishijima H; Takanaka T; Kawashima H; Saito Y; Takashima C; Nakamura S; Michigishi T; Yokoyama K
Breast Cancer; 1995 Apr; 2(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 11091529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
