These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35570168)

  • 1. Does enhancement filter application increase the diagnostic accuracy of misfit detection at the implant-prosthesis interface?
    Mouzinho-Machado S; Borges GB; Pacheco-de-Oliveira-Mota V; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1136-1143. PubMed ID: 35570168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of radiographic acquisition methods and visualization software programs on the detection of misfits at the implant-abutment interface: An ex vivo study.
    Siqueira AP; Pacheco de Oliveira Mota V; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):107.e1-107.e7. PubMed ID: 34839908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of misfits at the abutment-prosthesis interface in the esthetic zone: Implications of the radiographic technique and the magnitude of the misfit.
    de Oliveira Mota VP; Braga MS; Loss AA; Mello HN; Rosetti EP; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):239.e1-239.e9. PubMed ID: 37455164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of 4 intraoral radiographic techniques for misfit detection at the implant abutment joint.
    Darós P; Carneiro VC; Siqueira AP; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 29150129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misfit detection in implant-supported prostheses of different compositions by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Araujo-Siqueira C; Carneiro VC; Oliveira ML; Azeredo RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):205-213. PubMed ID: 32723499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of Digital Versus Conventional Periapical Radiographs to Detect Misfit at the Implant-Abutment Interface.
    Cançado Oliveira BF; Valerio CS; Jansen WC; Zenóbio EG; Manzi FR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1023-9. PubMed ID: 27632256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging evaluating of the implant/bone interface-an in vitro radiographic study.
    Vidor MM; Liedke GS; Vizzotto MB; da Silveira HLD; da Silveira PF; Araujo CW; da Silveira HED
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160296. PubMed ID: 28211288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of enhancement filters in measuring in vitro peri-implant bone level.
    de Azevedo Vaz SL; Neves FS; Figueirêdo EP; Haiter-Neto F; Campos PS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1074-7. PubMed ID: 22762154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Three Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems in the Detection of Implant-Abutment Misfit.
    Carneiro VC; Siqueira CA; Valentim FB; Oliveira AL; Oliveira ML; Azeredo RA; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 30856646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of different spatial resolutions and enhancement filters on radiographic detection of simulated furcation defects with intraoral digital radiography.
    Santos CV; Correia VAG; Felizardo HMA; Esteves A; Rossi-Júnior WC; Pigossi SC; Gaêta-Araujo H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Oct; 136(4):518-528. PubMed ID: 37407350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of enhancement filters of a CMOS system on halo artifact expression at the bone-to-implant interface.
    Braga MS; de Almeida Ramos AM; Coelho-Silva F; Bonadiman EA; Pereira TCR; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Feb; 28(3):161. PubMed ID: 38381269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do image enhancement filters in complementary metal oxide semiconductor and photostimulable phosphor imaging systems improve the detection of fractured endodontic instruments in periapical radiography?
    Costa ED; Brasil DM; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Feb; 131(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 32811790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of VistaScan image enhancement filters on diagnosis of simulated periapical lesions on intraoral radiographs.
    Brasil DM; Yamasaki MC; Santaella GM; Guido MCZ; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180146. PubMed ID: 30260235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the combined assessment of two digital enhancement filters in periapical radiographs obtained with different projection angles in the detection of simulated dental root fractures.
    Wanderley VA; Oliveira ML; Silva ALP; Tosoni GM
    Oral Radiol; 2022 Apr; 38(2):234-239. PubMed ID: 34195932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A radiographic analysis of implant component misfit.
    Sharkey S; Kelly A; Houston F; O'Sullivan M; Quinn F; O'Connell B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):807-15. PubMed ID: 21841991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of denoising and enhancement filters for detection of approximal and occlusal caries on digital intraoral radiographs.
    Shokri A; Kasraei S; Lari S; Mahmoodzadeh M; Khaleghi A; Musavi S; Akheshteh V
    J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 29674818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.