88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35570366)
1. Clinical performance of implant-supported single hybrid abutment crown restoration: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang M; Ho DKL; Pelekos G; Fok MR
J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan; 68(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 37316260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. One Piece CAD/CAM Abutment for Screw-Retained Single-Tooth Restorations: A 5-Year Prospective Cohort Study.
Parpaiola A; Toia M; Norton M; Bacci C; Todaro C; Rodriguez Y Baena R; Lupi SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 May; 0(0):1-29. PubMed ID: 38717350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Implant Abutment Angle and Height on Peri-implant Tissue Health: Retrospective Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Rathe F; Junker R; Blumenröhr J; Martin L; Löhlein N; Heumann C; Auschill T; Arweiler N; Schlee M
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 38381982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single crown restorations supported by 6-mm implants in the resorbed posterior mandible: A 10-year prospective case series.
Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Gareb B; Vissink A; Meijer HJA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38534097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-sectional analysis comparing prefabricated titanium to individualized hybrid zirconia abutments for cemented zirconia based fixed dental prostheses: a critical concept assessment.
Neckel N; Pohl J; Preissner S; Wagendorf O; Sachse C; Vach K; Heiland M; Nahles S
Int J Implant Dent; 2024 Mar; 10(1):13. PubMed ID: 38498247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparative Evaluation of Prosthetic and Biological Outcome as Influenced by Two Different Implant Restorative Materials (Porcelain Fused to Metal and Monolith Zirconia): A Prospective, Cross-arch Study.
Malhotra T; Kumar Yadav B; Singh Phukela S; Bhardwaj A; Khandait M; Nagpal A; Shetty O
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 May; 0(0):1-33. PubMed ID: 38727622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Single Tooth Implant Placement With and Without Allogenic Soft Tissue Augmentation. A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Al-Tarawneh SK; Thalji G; Fernandez Lozada M; Waia D; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr; 0(0):1-37. PubMed ID: 38607353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized clinical trial on zirconia versus titanium implants in maxillary single tooth replacement.
de Beus JHW; Cune MS; Slot JWA; Jensen-Louwerse C; la Bastide-van Gemert S; Meijer HJA; Raghoebar GM; Schepke U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38567929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of marginal bone loss in SLA and RBM implants: A prospective cohort study.
Nemati M; Dadkhah B; Tabrizi R; Shafiei S; Moslemi H
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023; 14(3):388-391. PubMed ID: 38273914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical application principles and new developments of zirconia crown.
Wang J; Yang L
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Apr; 42(2):135-141. PubMed ID: 38597073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Potential Value of Probiotics after Dental Implant Placement.
Xu J; Chen C; Gan S; Liao Y; Fu R; Hou C; Yang S; Zheng Z; Chen W
Microorganisms; 2023 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 37513016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Comparison of Survival Rates between Narrow Diameter Implants and Standard Diameter Implants: An Updated Meta-analysis.
Ganji K; Rostamzadeh M; Talimkhani I; Moradi Y
Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2023; 37():5. PubMed ID: 37123329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparative Study Between Hybrid Abutments and Standard Abutments in Implant-Supported Prosthesis: A Split-Mouth Clinical Trial.
Alsaadi MN; Morad ML; Darwich K; Kanout S; Husein HA
Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31993. PubMed ID: 36600816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Marginal Bone Integrity and Aftermarket Abutment Screws on Dental Implant Systems-A Preliminary Study with Finite Element Method.
Wu YL; Tsai MH; Chen HS; Lin CP; Wu AY
Materials (Basel); 2022 Aug; 15(17):. PubMed ID: 36079334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of apico-coronal positioning of tissue-level implants on marginal bone stability during supracrestal tissue height establishment: A multi-center prospective study.
Spinato S; Bernardello F; Lombardi T; Soardi CM; Messina M; Zaffe D; Stacchi C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 24(5):611-620. PubMed ID: 36000363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restorative angle of zirconia restorations cemented on non-original titanium bases influences the initial marginal bone loss: 5-year results of a prospective cohort study.
Strauss FJ; Siegenthaler M; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I; Jung RE; Thoma DS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jul; 33(7):745-756. PubMed ID: 35570366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Veneered zirconia abutments cemented on non-original titanium bases: 1-year results of a prospective case series.
Asgeirsson AG; Sailer I; Gamper F; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Aug; 30(8):735-744. PubMed ID: 31102476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing zirconia-based versus metal-based implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the premolar region.
Hosseini M; Worsaae N; Gotfredsen K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Aug; 33(8):792-803. PubMed ID: 35633183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Zirconia reconstructions cemented on non-original titanium bases may result in increased bleeding on probing, probing depth values and varying mean marginal bone levels.
Stucki L; Asgeirsson AG; Jung RE; Sailer I; Hämmerle CH; Thoma DS
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(5):560–566. PubMed ID: 33616565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
