261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35570408)
21. 3D-GNOME 2.0: a three-dimensional genome modeling engine for predicting structural variation-driven alterations of chromatin spatial structure in the human genome.
Wlasnowolski M; Sadowski M; Czarnota T; Jodkowska K; Szalaj P; Tang Z; Ruan Y; Plewczynski D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jul; 48(W1):W170-W176. PubMed ID: 32442297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genome structural variation in human evolution.
Hollox EJ; Zuccherato LW; Tucci S
Trends Genet; 2022 Jan; 38(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 34284881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Chromosome conformation capture technologies as tools to detect structural variations and their repercussion in chromatin 3D configuration.
Stephenson-Gussinye A; Furlan-Magaril M
Front Cell Dev Biol; 2023; 11():1219968. PubMed ID: 37457299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Structural variations in cancer and the 3D genome.
Dubois F; Sidiropoulos N; Weischenfeldt J; Beroukhim R
Nat Rev Cancer; 2022 Sep; 22(9):533-546. PubMed ID: 35764888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Integrated paired-end enhancer profiling and whole-genome sequencing reveals recurrent
Ooi WF; Nargund AM; Lim KJ; Zhang S; Xing M; Mandoli A; Lim JQ; Ho SWT; Guo Y; Yao X; Lin SJ; Nandi T; Xu C; Ong X; Lee M; Tan AL; Lam YN; Teo JX; Kaneda A; White KP; Lim WK; Rozen SG; Teh BT; Li S; Skanderup AJ; Tan P
Gut; 2020 Jun; 69(6):1039-1052. PubMed ID: 31542774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Global analysis of somatic structural genomic alterations and their impact on gene expression in diverse human cancers.
Alaei-Mahabadi B; Bhadury J; Karlsson JW; Nilsson JA; Larsson E
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(48):13768-13773. PubMed ID: 27856756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detection and visualization of complex structural variants from long reads.
Stephens Z; Wang C; Iyer RK; Kocher JP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 20):508. PubMed ID: 30577744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Structural variation in the chicken genome identified by paired-end next-generation DNA sequencing of reduced representation libraries.
Kerstens HH; Crooijmans RP; Dibbits BW; Vereijken A; Okimoto R; Groenen MA
BMC Genomics; 2011 Feb; 12():94. PubMed ID: 21291514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comprehensive long-span paired-end-tag mapping reveals characteristic patterns of structural variations in epithelial cancer genomes.
Hillmer AM; Yao F; Inaki K; Lee WH; Ariyaratne PN; Teo AS; Woo XY; Zhang Z; Zhao H; Ukil L; Chen JP; Zhu F; So JB; Salto-Tellez M; Poh WT; Zawack KF; Nagarajan N; Gao S; Li G; Kumar V; Lim HP; Sia YY; Chan CS; Leong ST; Neo SC; Choi PS; Thoreau H; Tan PB; Shahab A; Ruan X; Bergh J; Hall P; Cacheux-Rataboul V; Wei CL; Yeoh KG; Sung WK; Bourque G; Liu ET; Ruan Y
Genome Res; 2011 May; 21(5):665-75. PubMed ID: 21467267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Unravelling the tumour genome: The evolutionary and clinical impacts of structural variants in tumourigenesis.
Hamdan A; Ewing A
J Pathol; 2022 Jul; 257(4):479-493. PubMed ID: 35355264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Structural Variations of the 3D Genome Architecture in Cervical Cancer Development.
Adeel MM; Jiang H; Arega Y; Cao K; Lin D; Cao C; Cao G; Wu P; Li G
Front Cell Dev Biol; 2021; 9():706375. PubMed ID: 34368157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Integrative reconstruction of cancer genome karyotypes using InfoGenomeR.
Lee Y; Lee H
Nat Commun; 2021 Apr; 12(1):2467. PubMed ID: 33927198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Amplification and thrifty single-molecule sequencing of recurrent somatic structural variations.
Patel A; Schwab R; Liu YT; Bafna V
Genome Res; 2014 Feb; 24(2):318-28. PubMed ID: 24307551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Next generation mapping reveals novel large genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer.
Jaratlerdsiri W; Chan EKF; Petersen DC; Yang C; Croucher PI; Bornman MSR; Sheth P; Hayes VM
Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(14):23588-23602. PubMed ID: 28423598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Most large structural variants in cancer genomes can be detected without long reads.
Choo ZN; Behr JM; Deshpande A; Hadi K; Yao X; Tian H; Takai K; Zakusilo G; Rosiene J; Da Cruz Paula A; Weigelt B; Setton J; Riaz N; Powell SN; Busam K; Shoushtari AN; Ariyan C; Reis-Filho J; de Lange T; Imieliński M
Nat Genet; 2023 Dec; 55(12):2139-2148. PubMed ID: 37945902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Toward the functional interpretation of somatic structural variations: bulk- and single-cell approaches.
Yi D; Nam JW; Jeong H
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 37587831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Oxford Nanopore and Bionano Genomics technologies evaluation for plant structural variation detection.
Canaguier A; Guilbaud R; Denis E; Magdelenat G; Belser C; Istace B; Cruaud C; Wincker P; Le Paslier MC; Faivre-Rampant P; Barbe V
BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):317. PubMed ID: 35448948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Genome-wide detection of enhancer-hijacking events from chromatin interaction data in rearranged genomes.
Wang X; Xu J; Zhang B; Hou Y; Song F; Lyu H; Yue F
Nat Methods; 2021 Jun; 18(6):661-668. PubMed ID: 34092790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. LinkedSV for detection of mosaic structural variants from linked-read exome and genome sequencing data.
Fang L; Kao C; Gonzalez MV; Mafra FA; Pellegrino da Silva R; Li M; Wenzel SS; Wimmer K; Hakonarson H; Wang K
Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5585. PubMed ID: 31811119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Chromatin organization modulates the origin of heritable structural variations in human genome.
Roychowdhury T; Abyzov A
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Apr; 47(6):2766-2777. PubMed ID: 30773596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
