These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35570661)

  • 21. Creating Inquiry Between Technology Developers and Civil Society Actors: Learning from Experiences Around Nanotechnology.
    Krabbenborg L
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Jun; 22(3):907-22. PubMed ID: 26040841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building.
    Selin C; Rawlings KC; de Ridder-Vignone K; Sadowski J; Altamirano Allende C; Gano G; Davies SR; Guston DH
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Aug; 26(6):634-649. PubMed ID: 26769749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Redesigning the architecture of policy-making: Engaging with Māori on nanotechnology in New Zealand.
    Munshi D; Kurian PA; Morrison T; Morrison SL
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Apr; 25(3):287-302. PubMed ID: 25193966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A mirror for science.
    Jasanoff S
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 24434707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Public engagement on global health challenges.
    Cohen ER; Masum H; Berndtson K; Saunders V; Hadfield T; Panjwani D; Persad DL; Minhas GS; Daar AS; Singh JA; Singer PA
    BMC Public Health; 2008 May; 8():168. PubMed ID: 18492256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Constructing the public in public perceptions research: A case study of forest genomics.
    Berseth V; Taylor J; Hutchen J; Nguyen V; Schott S; Klenk N
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 May; 33(4):483-503. PubMed ID: 38095191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Art-Science Collaboration in an EPSRC/BBSRC-Funded Synthetic Biology UK Research Centre.
    Reinsborough M
    Nanoethics; 2020; 14(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 32435319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making.
    Wortley S; Tong A; Howard K
    Aust Health Rev; 2017 Mar; 41(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27050156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Steering vaccinomics innovations with anticipatory governance and participatory foresight.
    Ozdemir V; Faraj SA; Knoppers BM
    OMICS; 2011 Sep; 15(9):637-46. PubMed ID: 21848419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Public bioethics and public engagement: the politics of "proper talk".
    Moore A
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 20533798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why should we promote public engagement with science?
    Stilgoe J; Lock SJ; Wilsdon J
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 24434705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives.
    Woolley JP; McGowan ML; Teare HJ; Coathup V; Fishman JR; Settersten RA; Sterckx S; Kaye J; Juengst ET
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 27260081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.
    Degeling C; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Apr; 131():114-21. PubMed ID: 25770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Public and stakeholder participation for managing and reducing the risks of shale gas development.
    North DW; Stern PC; Webler T; Field P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(15):8388-96. PubMed ID: 24780072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Unbalanced progress: The hard road from science popularisation to public engagement with science in China.
    Jia H; Liu L
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 24434709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Technoscience, imagined publics and public imaginations.
    Rommetveit K; Wynne B
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Feb; 26(2):133-147. PubMed ID: 28168940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lab work goes social, and vice versa: strategising public engagement processes : commentary on: "What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory".
    Wynne B
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 22015948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Food, publics, science.
    Blue G
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 20533794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What have we learned from public engagement?
    Jones R
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2007 May; 2(5):262-3. PubMed ID: 18654275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visions and versions of governing biomedicine: narratives on power structures, decision-making and public participation in the field of biomedical technology in the Austrian context.
    Felt U; Fochler M; Mager A; Winkler P
    Soc Stud Sci; 2008 Apr; 38(2):233-57. PubMed ID: 18831132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.