These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35570663)

  • 21. N270 sensitivity to conflict strength and working memory: A combined ERP and sLORETA study.
    Scannella S; Pariente J; De Boissezon X; Castel-Lacanal E; Chauveau N; Causse M; Dehais F; Pastor J
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 297():231-40. PubMed ID: 26477377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Imagery and retrieval of auditory and visual information: neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful performance.
    Huijbers W; Pennartz CM; Rubin DC; Daselaar SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1730-40. PubMed ID: 21396384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does spatial attention modulate sensory memory?
    Botta F; Martín-Arévalo E; Lupiáñez J; Bartolomeo P
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219504. PubMed ID: 31295296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Peripheral visual localization is degraded by globally incongruent auditory-spatial attention cues.
    Ahveninen J; Ingalls G; Yildirim F; Calabro FJ; Vaina LM
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 237(9):2137-2143. PubMed ID: 31201472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditory temporal preparation induced by rhythmic cues during concurrent auditory working memory tasks.
    Cutanda D; Correa Á; Sanabria D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 25893682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.
    Ortega L; Guzman-Martinez E; Grabowecky M; Suzuki S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jul; 76(5):1485-502. PubMed ID: 24806403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study.
    Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Mar; 24(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 23172773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spatial attention based on 2D location and relative depth order modulates visual working memory in a 3D environment.
    Fang W; Wang K; Zhang K; Qian J
    Br J Psychol; 2023 Feb; 114(1):112-131. PubMed ID: 36161427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Object-based selection in visual working memory.
    Lin YT; Kong G; Fougnie D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Dec; 28(6):1961-1971. PubMed ID: 34258730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Alterations in visual cortical activation and connectivity with prefrontal cortex during working memory updating in major depressive disorder.
    Le TM; Borghi JA; Kujawa AJ; Klein DN; Leung HC
    Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 14():43-53. PubMed ID: 28138426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory and visual differences in time perception? An investigation from a developmental perspective with neuropsychological tests.
    Zélanti PS; Droit-Volet S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jul; 112(3):296-311. PubMed ID: 22621934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Source information is inherently linked to working memory representation for auditory but not for visual stimuli.
    Xu M; Fu Y; Yu J; Zhu P; Shen M; Chen H
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104160. PubMed ID: 31945679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.
    Wahn B; König P
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Role of Visual and Auditory Communication in the Performance of a Joint Team Task.
    Werner AF; Gorman JC
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663-694. PubMed ID: 34310225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial distribution of attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory following multiple cues.
    Botta F; Lupiáñez J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():1-13. PubMed ID: 24793127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The location but not the attributes of visual cues are automatically encoded into working memory.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():76-85. PubMed ID: 25490435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task.
    Potts GF; Wood SM; Kothmann D; Martin LE
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():126-39. PubMed ID: 18723003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The neural basis of visual dominance in the context of audio-visual object processing.
    Schmid C; Büchel C; Rose M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):304-11. PubMed ID: 21112404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.