178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35571476)
1. Resection depth for small colorectal polyps comparing cold snare polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.
Toyosawa J; Yamasaki Y; Fujimoto T; Tanaka S; Tanaka T; Mitsuhashi T; Okada H
Endosc Int Open; 2022 May; 10(5):E602-E608. PubMed ID: 35571476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pedunculated colorectal polyps with heads ≤ 1 cm in diameter can be resected using cold snare polypectomy.
Kudo T; Horiuchi A; Horiuchi I; Kajiyama M; Morita A; Tanaka N
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2021; 84(3):411-415. PubMed ID: 34599564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Width and depth of resection for small colorectal polyps: hot versus cold snare polypectomy.
Suzuki S; Gotoda T; Kusano C; Ikehara H; Sugita A; Yamauchi M; Moriyama M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Apr; 87(4):1095-1103. PubMed ID: 29122600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.
Meng QQ; Rao M; Gao PJ
World J Clin Cases; 2022 Jul; 10(19):6446-6455. PubMed ID: 35979305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Different endoscopic treatments for small colorectal polyps: A systematic review, pair-wise, and network meta-analysis.
Li X; Zhu H; Li F; Li R; Xu H
Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1154411. PubMed ID: 37089613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of Less Than 10-mm-Sized Pedunculated (Ip) Polyps with Thin Stalk: Hot Snare Polypectomy Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy.
Arimoto J; Chiba H; Ashikari K; Fukui R; Tachikawa J; Okada N; Suto T; Kawano N; Niikura T; Kuwabara H; Nakaoka M; Ida T; Goto T; Nakajima A
Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(7):2353-2361. PubMed ID: 32623550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Liu W; Gong J; Gu L
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 May; 38(1):136. PubMed ID: 37204495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).
Zhang Z; Xia Y; Cui H; Yuan X; Wang C; Xie J; Tong Y; Wang W; Xu L
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 32967616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial.
Pedersen IB; Rawa-Golebiewska A; Calderwood AH; Brix LD; Grode LB; Botteri E; Bugajski M; Kaminski MF; Januszewicz W; Ødegaard H; Kleist B; Kalager M; Løberg M; Bretthauer M; Hoff G; Medhus A; Holme Ø
Endoscopy; 2022 Oct; 54(10):961-969. PubMed ID: 35008112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hot snare vs. cold snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of 4 - 10 mm colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Jegadeesan R; Aziz M; Desai M; Sundararajan T; Gorrepati VS; Chandrasekar VT; Jayaraj M; Singh P; Saeed A; Rai T; Choudhary A; Repici A; Hassan C; Fuccio L; Sharma P
Endosc Int Open; 2019 May; 7(5):E708-E716. PubMed ID: 31073538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Resectability of Small Duodenal Tumors: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Cold Snare Polypectomy.
Miyazaki K; Nakayama A; Sasaki M; Minezaki D; Morioka K; Iwata K; Masunaga T; Kubosawa Y; Mizutani M; Hayashi Y; Kiguchi Y; Akimoto T; Takatori Y; Kawasaki S; Matsuura N; Sujino T; Takabayashi K; Yamanoi K; Mori K; Kanai T; Yahagi N; Kato M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2024 May; 119(5):856-863. PubMed ID: 38131610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Hot Snare Polypectomy and Cold Snare Polypectomy for Removing Small Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Winston K; Maulahela H; Raharjo DE; Tjoa K; Jonlean R
Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e38713. PubMed ID: 37292560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study).
Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Asai S; Yokota I; Akamine E; Kato M; Akamatsu T; Tada K; Komeda Y; Iwatate M; Kawakami K; Nishikawa M; Watanabe D; Yamauchi A; Fukata N; Shimatani M; Ooi M; Fujita K; Sano Y; Kashida H; Hirose S; Iwagami H; Uedo N; Teramukai S; Tanaka K
Gut; 2018 Nov; 67(11):1950-1957. PubMed ID: 28970290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cold Snare Polypectomy in Small (<10 mm) Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Canakis A; Chandan S; Bapaye J; Canakis J; Twery B; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Facciorusso A; Bilal M; Adler DG
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2024 Apr; 58(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 38289665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resection rates and safety profile of cold vs. hot snare polypectomy in polyps sized 5-10 mm and 11-20 mm.
Gessl I; Waldmann E; Penz D; Majcher B; Dokladanska A; Hinterberger A; Szymanska A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Apr; 51(4):536-541. PubMed ID: 30853272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
de Benito Sanz M; Hernández L; Garcia Martinez MI; Diez-Redondo P; Joao Matias D; Gonzalez-Santiago JM; Ibáñez M; Núñez Rodríguez MH; Cimavilla M; Tafur C; Mata L; Guardiola-Arévalo A; Feito J; García-Alonso FJ;
Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 33264811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized control trial and one-year follow-up study.
Ito T; Takahashi K; Tanabe H; Sato K; Goto M; Sato T; Tanaka K; Utsumi T; Fujinaga A; Kawamoto T; Yanagawa N; Moriichi K; Fujiya M; Okumura T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jun; 100(23):e26296. PubMed ID: 34115035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resection depth and layer of cold snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection.
Ito A; Suga T; Ota H; Tateiwa N; Matsumoto A; Tanaka E
J Gastroenterol; 2018 Nov; 53(11):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 29516270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
