These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35571598)

  • 1. Norwegian judges' knowledge of factors affecting eyewitness testimony: a 12-year follow-up.
    Bjørndal LD; McGill L; Magnussen S; Richardson S; Saraiva R; Stadel M; Brennen T
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(5):665-682. PubMed ID: 35571598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.
    Wells GL; Memon A; Penrod SD
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Nov; 7(2):45-75. PubMed ID: 26158855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony be improved?
    Wise RA; Kehn A
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 32944129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legal Professionals' Knowledge of Eyewitness Testimony in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
    Jiang L; Luo D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148116. PubMed ID: 26828933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expert testimony on eyewitness evidence: in search of common sense.
    Houston KA; Hope L; Memon A; Don Read J
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):637-51. PubMed ID: 24000168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What Italian Defense Attorneys Know about Factors Affecting Eyewitness Accuracy: A Comparison with U.S. and Norwegian Samples.
    Magnussen S; Safer MA; Sartori G; Wise RA
    Front Psychiatry; 2013; 4():28. PubMed ID: 23720639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eyewitness testimony: tracing the beliefs of Swedish legal professionals.
    Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Hartwig M
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(5):709-27. PubMed ID: 16170786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An examination of the causes and solutions to eyewitness error.
    Wise RA; Sartori G; Magnussen S; Safer MA
    Front Psychiatry; 2014; 5():102. PubMed ID: 25165459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judges', lay judges', and police officers' beliefs about factors affecting children's testimony about sexual abuse.
    Leander L; Christianson SA; Svedin CG; Granhag PA
    J Psychol; 2007 Jul; 141(4):341-57. PubMed ID: 17725070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between judges' scores and dive attributes from a video recording of a diving competition.
    Luedeker B; McGee M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273374. PubMed ID: 36001647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From discretion to disagreement: explaining disparities in judges' pretrial decisions.
    Dhami MK
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(3):367-86. PubMed ID: 15549716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eyewitness testimony.
    Wells GL; Olson EA
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2003; 54():277-95. PubMed ID: 12209024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The double-edged sword: does biomechanism increase or decrease judges' sentencing of psychopaths?
    Aspinwall LG; Brown TR; Tabery J
    Science; 2012 Aug; 337(6096):846-9. PubMed ID: 22904010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Judges and forensic science education: A national survey.
    Garrett BL; Gardner BO; Murphy E; Grimes P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110714. PubMed ID: 33592556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beliefs and expectancies in legal decision making: an introduction to the Special Issue.
    McAuliff BD; Bornstein BH
    Psychol Crime Law; 2012; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 24348006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judging in the genomic era: judges' genetic knowledge, confidence and need for training.
    Selita F; Smereczynska V; Chapman R; Toivainen T; Kovas Y
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2020 Oct; 28(10):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 32457517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judges' perceptions of expert reports: The effect of neuroscience evidence.
    Moulin V; Mouchet C; Pillonel T; Gkotsi GM; Baertschi B; Gasser J; Testé B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 61():22-29. PubMed ID: 30454558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: are judges effective gatekeepers?
    Kovera MB; McAuliff BD
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Aug; 85(4):574-86. PubMed ID: 10948802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eyewitness testimony in the Lockerbie bombing case.
    Loftus EF
    Memory; 2013 Jul; 21(5):584-590. PubMed ID: 23439258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How effective is the motion-to-suppress safeguard? Judges' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures.
    Stinson V; Devenport JL; Cutler BL; Kravitz DA
    J Appl Psychol; 1997 Apr; 82(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 9109279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.