These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35572638)

  • 1. Differences in the Composition of the Rumen Microbiota of Finishing Beef Cattle Divergently Ranked for Residual Methane Emissions.
    Smith PE; Kelly AK; Kenny DA; Waters SM
    Front Microbiol; 2022; 13():855565. PubMed ID: 35572638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of divergence in residual methane emissions on feed intake and efficiency, growth and carcass performance, and indices of rumen fermentation and methane emissions in finishing beef cattle.
    Smith PE; Waters SM; Kenny DA; Kirwan SF; Conroy S; Kelly AK
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Nov; 99(11):. PubMed ID: 34598276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle.
    Wallace RJ; Rooke JA; McKain N; Duthie CA; Hyslop JJ; Ross DW; Waterhouse A; Watson M; Roehe R
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():839. PubMed ID: 26494241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Links between the rumen microbiota, methane emissions and feed efficiency of finishing steers offered dietary lipid and nitrate supplementation.
    Bowen JM; Cormican P; Lister SJ; McCabe MS; Duthie CA; Roehe R; Dewhurst RJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231759. PubMed ID: 32330150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbiome-informed study of the mechanistic basis of methane inhibition by
    Indugu N; Narayan K; Stefenoni HA; Hennessy ML; Vecchiarelli B; Bender JS; Shah R; Dai G; Garapati S; Yarish C; Welchez SC; Räisänen SE; Wasson D; Lage C; Melgar A; Hristov AN; Pitta DW
    mBio; 2024 Aug; 15(8):e0078224. PubMed ID: 38953639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rumen metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses of low methane yield sheep reveals a Sharpea-enriched microbiome characterised by lactic acid formation and utilisation.
    Kamke J; Kittelmann S; Soni P; Li Y; Tavendale M; Ganesh S; Janssen PH; Shi W; Froula J; Rubin EM; Attwood GT
    Microbiome; 2016 Oct; 4(1):56. PubMed ID: 27760570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rumen methanogenic genotypes differ in abundance according to host residual feed intake phenotype and diet type.
    Carberry CA; Waters SM; Kenny DA; Creevey CJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 80(2):586-94. PubMed ID: 24212580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal changes in total and metabolically active ruminal methanogens in dairy cows supplemented with 3-nitrooxypropanol.
    Pitta DW; Melgar A; Hristov AN; Indugu N; Narayan KS; Pappalardo C; Hennessy ML; Vecchiarelli B; Kaplan-Shabtai V; Kindermann M; Walker N
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Aug; 104(8):8721-8735. PubMed ID: 34024597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corn oil supplementation enhances hydrogen use for biohydrogenation, inhibits methanogenesis, and alters fermentation pathways and the microbial community in the rumen of goats.
    Zhang XM; Medrano RF; Wang M; Beauchemin KA; Ma ZY; Wang R; Wen JN; Lukuyu BA; Tan ZL; He JH
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4999-5008. PubMed ID: 31740932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-Related Response of Rumen Microbiota to Mineral Salt and Effects of Their Interactions on Enteric Methane Emissions in Cattle.
    Liu C; Li XH; Chen YX; Cheng ZH; Duan QH; Meng QH; Tao XP; Shang B; Dong HM
    Microb Ecol; 2017 Apr; 73(3):590-601. PubMed ID: 27924402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Establishment of methanogen bacterial interactions during the preweaning period of dairy cattle.
    Indugu N; Narayan KS; Hennessy ML; Pitta D
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0310648. PubMed ID: 39302919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of 3-nitrooxypropanol and canola oil to mitigate enteric methane emissions of beef cattle results in distinctly different effects on the rumen microbial community.
    Gruninger RJ; Zhang XM; Smith ML; Kung L; Vyas D; McGinn SM; Kindermann M; Wang M; Tan ZL; Beauchemin KA
    Anim Microbiome; 2022 May; 4(1):35. PubMed ID: 35642048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prokaryotic Diversity of Ruminal Content and Its Relationship with Methane Emissions in Cattle from Kazakhstan.
    Daugaliyeva A; Daugaliyeva S; Ashanin A; Beltramo C; Mamyrova L; Yessembekova Z; Peletto S
    Life (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36431046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phenotypic relationship and repeatability of methane emissions and performance traits in beef cattle using a GreenFeed system.
    Ryan CV; Pabiou T; Purfield DC; Conroy S; Kirwan SF; Crowley JJ; Murphy CP; Evans RD
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36268991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Plane of nutrition affects the phylogenetic diversity and relative abundance of transcriptionally active methanogens in the bovine rumen.
    McGovern E; McCabe MS; Cormican P; Popova M; Keogh K; Kelly AK; Kenny DA; Waters SM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13047. PubMed ID: 29026096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Illumina MiSeq Phylogenetic Amplicon Sequencing Shows a Large Reduction of an Uncharacterised Succinivibrionaceae and an Increase of the Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii Clade in Feed Restricted Cattle.
    McCabe MS; Cormican P; Keogh K; O'Connor A; O'Hara E; Palladino RA; Kenny DA; Waters SM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133234. PubMed ID: 26226343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nitrate decreases ruminal methane production with slight changes to ruminal methanogen composition of nitrate-adapted steers.
    Zhao L; Meng Q; Li Y; Wu H; Huo Y; Zhang X; Zhou Z
    BMC Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):21. PubMed ID: 29554875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feed efficiency and enteric methane emissions indices are inconsistent with the outcomes of the rumen microbiome composition.
    Fregulia P; Campos MM; Dhakal R; Dias RJP; Neves ALA
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Nov; 949():175263. PubMed ID: 39102957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Holistic Assessment of Rumen Microbiome Dynamics through Quantitative Metatranscriptomics Reveals Multifunctional Redundancy during Key Steps of Anaerobic Feed Degradation.
    Söllinger A; Tveit AT; Poulsen M; Noel SJ; Bengtsson M; Bernhardt J; Frydendahl Hellwing AL; Lund P; Riedel K; Schleper C; Højberg O; Urich T
    mSystems; 2018; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 30116788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions.
    Leahy SC; Kelly WJ; Altermann E; Ronimus RS; Yeoman CJ; Pacheco DM; Li D; Kong Z; McTavish S; Sang C; Lambie SC; Janssen PH; Dey D; Attwood GT
    PLoS One; 2010 Jan; 5(1):e8926. PubMed ID: 20126622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.