These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35572904)

  • 21. Ministernotomy versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: a multicenter study.
    Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Sartipy U; Svenarud P
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Feb; 99(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 25483001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mini-sternotomy versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement: a single-centre experience.
    M Castro P; A Saraiva F; J Cerqueira R; Moreira S; J Amorim M; Leite-Moreira AF; Macedo F
    Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc; 2018; 25(3-4):119-126. PubMed ID: 30599467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.
    Kaneko T; Loberman D; Gosev I; Rassam F; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn L
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 24183906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Techniques and Median Sternotomy in Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Semsroth S; Matteucci Gothe R; Raith YR; de Brabandere K; Hanspeter E; Kilo J; Kofler M; Müller L; Ruttman-Ulmer E; Grimm M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Sep; 104(3):877-883. PubMed ID: 28433220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative study of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless biological versus mechanical prostheses.
    Bociański M; Puślecki M; Olasińska-Wiśniewska A; Perek B; Stefaniak S; Buczkowski P; Jemielity M
    Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol; 2023 Jun; 20(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 37564970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement or re-replacement after previous cardiac surgery.
    Byrne JG; Karavas AN; Adams DH; Aklog L; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Rizzo RJ; Cohn LH
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2000 Sep; 18(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 10973536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgical results of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy: comparison with median sternotomy.
    Masiello P; Coscioni E; Panza A; Triumbari F; Preziosi G; Di Benedetto G
    Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Aug; 10(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 12359403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimally Invasive vs Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement With Rapid-Deployment Bioprostheses.
    D'Onofrio A; Tessari C; Lorenzoni G; Cibin G; Martinelli G; Alamanni F; Polvani G; Solinas M; Massetti M; Merlo M; Vendramin I; Di Eusanio M; Mignosa C; Mangino D; Russo C; Rinaldi M; Pacini D; Salvador L; Antona C; Maselli D; De Paulis R; Luzi G; Alfieri O; De Filippo CM; Portoghese M; Musumeci F; Colli A; Gregori D; Gerosa G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Jun; 111(6):1916-1922. PubMed ID: 33039363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. A safe and useful technique beyond the cosmetic benefits.
    Paredes FA; Cánovas SJ; Gil O; García-Fuster R; Hornero F; Vázquez A; Martín E; Mena A; Martínez-León J
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2013 Sep; 66(9):695-9. PubMed ID: 24773674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement.
    Shehada SE; Öztürk Ö; Wottke M; Lange R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):464-9; discussion 469-70. PubMed ID: 25732967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients.
    Welp HA; Herlemann I; Martens S; Deschka H
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 29617839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: Which will stand against transcatheter aortic valve replacement?
    Hirji SA; Funamoto M; Lee J; Ramirez Del Val F; Kolkailah AA; McGurk S; Pelletier MP; Aranki S; Shekar PS; Kaneko T
    Surgery; 2018 Aug; 164(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 29699805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery in obese patients: Can the bigger afford the smaller?
    Mikus E; Calvi S; Brega C; Zucchetta F; Tripodi A; Pin M; Manfrini M; Cimaglia P; Masiglat J; Albertini A
    J Card Surg; 2021 Feb; 36(2):582-588. PubMed ID: 33345384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally invasive access type related to outcomes of sutureless and rapid deployment valves.
    Andreas M; Berretta P; Solinas M; Santarpino G; Kappert U; Fiore A; Glauber M; Misfeld M; Savini C; Mikus E; Villa E; Phan K; Fischlein T; Meuris B; Martinelli G; Teoh K; Mignosa C; Shrestha M; Carrel TP; Yan T; Laufer G; Di Eusanio M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Nov; 58(5):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 32588056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Minimally invasive approach vs full sternotomy for aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement: results from our center].
    R Velho T; Duarte Ferreira H; Carvalheiro C; Sena A; Juqueira N; Guerra N; Gallego J; Nobre Â
    Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc; 2018; 25(1-2):35-40. PubMed ID: 30317708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement: Propensity matched data from two centers.
    Meyer A; van Kampen A; Kiefer P; Sündermann S; Van Praet KM; Borger MA; Falk V; Kempfert J
    J Card Surg; 2021 Jan; 36(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 33135258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ministernotomy or sternotomy in isolated aortic valve replacement? Early results.
    Filip G; Bryndza MA; Konstanty-Kalandyk J; Piatek J; Wegrzyn P; Ceranowicz P; Brzezinski M; Lakkireddy D; Kapelak B; Bartuś K
    Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol; 2018 Dec; 15(4):213-218. PubMed ID: 30647743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Less invasive replacement of aortic root, ascending aorta and hemiarch via partial upper sternotomy: a propensity-score-matched comparison with full sternotomy.
    Papadopoulos N; Ntinopoulos V; Haeussler A; Odavic D; Risteski P; Biefer HRC; Dzemali O
    Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2024 Jul; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 38941507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does full sternotomy have more significant impact than the cardiopulmonary bypass time in patients of mitral valve surgery?
    Qiu Z; Chen X; Xu Y; Huang F; Xiao L; Yang T; Yin L
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Apr; 13(1):29. PubMed ID: 29653554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement.
    Borger MA; Moustafine V; Conradi L; Knosalla C; Richter M; Merk DR; Doenst T; Hammerschmidt R; Treede H; Dohmen P; Strauch JT
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 99(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25441065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.