These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35573039)

  • 1. A simple spatial extension to the extended connectivity interaction features for binding affinity prediction.
    Orhobor OI; Rehim AA; Lou H; Ni H; King RD
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 May; 9(5):211745. PubMed ID: 35573039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extended connectivity interaction features: improving binding affinity prediction through chemical description.
    Sánchez-Cruz N; Medina-Franco JL; Mestres J; Barril X
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Jun; 37(10):1376-1382. PubMed ID: 33226061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-shelled ECIF: improved extended connectivity interaction features for accurate binding affinity prediction.
    Shiota K; Akutsu T
    Bioinform Adv; 2023; 3(1):vbad155. PubMed ID: 37928345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometric graph learning with extended atom-types features for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Rana MM; Nguyen DD
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Sep; 164():107250. PubMed ID: 37515872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of cross-docked poses on performance of machine learning classifier for protein-ligand binding pose prediction.
    Shen C; Hu X; Gao J; Zhang X; Zhong H; Wang Z; Xu L; Kang Y; Cao D; Hou T
    J Cheminform; 2021 Oct; 13(1):81. PubMed ID: 34656169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ET-score: Improving Protein-ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Based on Distance-weighted Interatomic Contact Features Using Extremely Randomized Trees Algorithm.
    Rayka M; Karimi-Jafari MH; Firouzi R
    Mol Inform; 2021 Aug; 40(8):e2060084. PubMed ID: 34021703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic Improvement of the Performance of Machine Learning Scoring Functions by Incorporating Features of Protein-Bound Water Molecules.
    Qu X; Dong L; Zhang J; Si Y; Wang B
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Sep; 62(18):4369-4379. PubMed ID: 36083808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Substituting random forest for multiple linear regression improves binding affinity prediction of scoring functions: Cyscore as a case study.
    Li H; Leung KS; Wong MH; Ballester PJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):291. PubMed ID: 25159129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CScore: a simple yet effective scoring function for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction using modified CMAC learning architecture.
    Ouyang X; Handoko SD; Kwoh CK
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2011 Dec; 9 Suppl 1():1-14. PubMed ID: 22144250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning from the ligand: using ligand-based features to improve binding affinity prediction.
    Boyles F; Deane CM; Morris GM
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(3):758-764. PubMed ID: 31598630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine learning on ligand-residue interaction profiles to significantly improve binding affinity prediction.
    Ji B; He X; Zhai J; Zhang Y; Man VH; Wang J
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33758923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structure-based protein-ligand interaction fingerprints for binding affinity prediction.
    Wang DD; Chan MT; Yan H
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2021; 19():6291-6300. PubMed ID: 34900139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proteo-chemometrics interaction fingerprints of protein-ligand complexes predict binding affinity.
    Wang DD; Xie H; Yan H
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Sep; 37(17):2570-2579. PubMed ID: 33650636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the accuracy of high-throughput protein-protein affinity prediction may require better training data.
    Dias R; Kolaczkowski B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 5):102. PubMed ID: 28361672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GB-score: Minimally designed machine learning scoring function based on distance-weighted interatomic contact features.
    Rayka M; Firouzi R
    Mol Inform; 2023 Mar; 42(3):e2200135. PubMed ID: 36722733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Crystallographic Data for the Development of Machine Learning Models to Predict Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity.
    Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo Junior WF
    Curr Med Chem; 2021 Oct; 28(34):7006-7022. PubMed ID: 33568025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational Prediction of Binding Affinity for CDK2-ligand Complexes. A Protein Target for Cancer Drug Discovery.
    Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo Junior WF
    Curr Med Chem; 2022; 29(14):2438-2455. PubMed ID: 34365938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explainable Machine Learning Techniques To Predict Amiodarone-Induced Thyroid Dysfunction Risk: Multicenter, Retrospective Study With External Validation.
    Lu YT; Chao HJ; Chiang YC; Chen HY
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e43734. PubMed ID: 36749620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.