176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35573293)
1. Eye-Movements During Navigation in a Virtual Environment: Sex Differences and Relationship to Sex Hormones.
Harris T; Hagg J; Pletzer B
Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():755393. PubMed ID: 35573293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation.
Andersen NE; Dahmani L; Konishi K; Bohbot VD
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Jan; 97(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 22001012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspective and strategy interactively modulate sex differences in a 3D navigation task.
Harris T; Scheuringer A; Pletzer B
Biol Sex Differ; 2019 Apr; 10(1):17. PubMed ID: 30954081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Navigation strategies in patients with vestibular loss tested in a virtual reality T-maze.
Gammeri R; Léonard J; Toupet M; Hautefort C; van Nechel C; Besnard S; Machado ML; Nakul E; Montava M; Lavieille JP; Lopez C
J Neurol; 2022 Aug; 269(8):4333-4348. PubMed ID: 35306619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of Landmark Use for Navigation in Children: Effects of Age, Sex, Working Memory and Landmark Type.
van Hoogmoed AH; Wegman J; van den Brink D; Janzen G
Brain Sci; 2022 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35741661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vestibular damage affects the precision and accuracy of navigation in a virtual visual environment.
Chari DA; Ahmad M; King S; Boutabla A; Fattahi C; Panic AS; Karmali F; Lewis RF
Brain Commun; 2023; 5(6):fcad345. PubMed ID: 38116141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex.
Fischer LF; Mojica Soto-Albors R; Buck F; Harnett MT
Elife; 2020 Mar; 9():. PubMed ID: 32154781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local spatial navigation or "steering" in patients with vestibular loss in a virtual reality environment.
Perez-Heydrich C; Pile M; Padova D; Cevallos A; Newman P; McNamara TP; Sayyid ZN; Agrawal Y
J Vestib Res; 2023; 33(6):377-383. PubMed ID: 38073359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex and strategy effects on brain activation during a 3D-navigation task.
Noachtar I; Harris TA; Hidalgo-Lopez E; Pletzer B
Commun Biol; 2022 Mar; 5(1):234. PubMed ID: 35296794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hippocampal Volume Reduction in Humans Predicts Impaired Allocentric Spatial Memory in Virtual-Reality Navigation.
Guderian S; Dzieciol AM; Gadian DG; Jentschke S; Doeller CF; Burgess N; Mishkin M; Vargha-Khadem F
J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 35(42):14123-31. PubMed ID: 26490854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating the different domains of environmental knowledge acquired from virtual navigation and their relationship to cognitive factors and wayfinding inclinations.
Muffato V; Miola L; Pellegrini M; Pazzaglia F; Meneghetti C
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Aug; 8(1):50. PubMed ID: 37530868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finding landmarks - An investigation of viewing behavior during spatial navigation in VR using a graph-theoretical analysis approach.
Walter JL; Essmann L; König SU; König P
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Jun; 18(6):e1009485. PubMed ID: 35666726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing Navigation in Real Space: Contributions to Understanding the Physiology and Pathology of Human Navigation Control.
Schöberl F; Zwergal A; Brandt T
Front Neural Circuits; 2020; 14():6. PubMed ID: 32210769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex Differences and Menstrual Cycle Dependent Changes in Cognitive Strategies during Spatial Navigation and Verbal Fluency.
Scheuringer A; Pletzer B
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():381. PubMed ID: 28367133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of sex, menstrual cycle, and hormonal contraceptives on egocentric navigation with or without landmarks.
Bernal A; Mateo-Martínez R; Paolieri D
Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2020 Oct; 120():104768. PubMed ID: 32615391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vestibular cues improve landmark-based route navigation: A simulated driving study.
Jabbari Y; Kenney DM; von Mohrenschildt M; Shedden JM
Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 34018119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Route-learning strategies in typical and atypical development; eye tracking reveals atypical landmark selection in Williams syndrome.
Farran EK; Formby S; Daniyal F; Holmes T; Van Herwegen J
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2016 Oct; 60(10):933-44. PubMed ID: 27634746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information.
Starrett MJ; Ekstrom AD
Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():281. PubMed ID: 30050422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Landmarks on Wayfinding and Brain Connectivity in Immersive Virtual Reality Environment.
Sharma G; Kaushal Y; Chandra S; Singh V; Mittal AP; Dutt V
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1220. PubMed ID: 28775698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing landmark-specific effects on route navigation in an ecologically valid setting: a simulated driving study.
Jabbari Y; Kenney DM; von Mohrenschildt M; Shedden JM
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Mar; 7(1):22. PubMed ID: 35254563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
