These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35574292)

  • 1. Citizen Science in Deliberative Systems: Participation, Epistemic Injustice, and Civic Empowerment.
    Herzog L; Lepenies R
    Minerva; 2022; 60(4):489-508. PubMed ID: 35574292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific citizenship in a democratic society.
    Arnason V
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):927-40. PubMed ID: 23825245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Citizen science as a data-based practice: A consideration of data justice.
    Christine DI; Thinyane M
    Patterns (N Y); 2021 Apr; 2(4):100224. PubMed ID: 33982019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mapping epistemic cultures and learning potential of participants in citizen science projects.
    Vallabh P; Lotz-Sisitka H; O'Donoghue R; Schudel I
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):540-9. PubMed ID: 27110848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deliberation, Citizen Science and Covid-19.
    Pearse H
    Polit Q; 2020; 91(3):571-577. PubMed ID: 32836410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are citizen juries and assemblies on climate change driving democratic climate policymaking? An exploration of two case studies in the UK.
    Wells R; Howarth C; Brand-Correa LI
    Clim Change; 2021; 168(1-2):5. PubMed ID: 34548720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equity, Participation, and Power: Achieving Health Justice Through Deep Democracy.
    Palmquist B
    J Law Med Ethics; 2020 Sep; 48(3):393-410. PubMed ID: 33021188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Citizen science beyond invited participation: nineteenth century amateur naturalists, epistemic autonomy, and big data approaches avant la lettre.
    Mahr D; Dickel S
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2019 Oct; 41(4):41. PubMed ID: 31591649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does democracy require value-neutral science? Analyzing the legitimacy of scientific information in the political sphere.
    Lusk G
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Dec; 90():102-110. PubMed ID: 34619535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Democratising science in deliberative systems: Mobilising lay expertise against industry waste dumping in Taiwan.
    Fan MF
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Jan; 32(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 35766337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epistemic Standards for Participatory Technology Assessment: Suggestions Based Upon Well-Ordered Science.
    Durán JM; Pirtle Z
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Jun; 26(3):1709-1741. PubMed ID: 32239384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophial analysis.
    Carel H; Kidd IJ
    Med Health Care Philos; 2014 Nov; 17(4):529-40. PubMed ID: 24740808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Believe me, only I know how I feel." An autoethnographic account of experiences of epistemic injustice in mental health care.
    Hultman L; Hultman M
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1058422. PubMed ID: 36911123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deliberative democracy in health care: current challenges and future prospects.
    Safaei J
    J Healthc Leadersh; 2015; 7():123-136. PubMed ID: 29355181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epistemic struggles: The role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health.
    Newbigging K; Ridley J
    Soc Sci Med; 2018 Dec; 219():36-44. PubMed ID: 30359905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epistemic injustice and mental health research: A pragmatic approach to working with lived experience expertise.
    Okoroji C; Mackay T; Robotham D; Beckford D; Pinfold V
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1114725. PubMed ID: 37056406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The epistemic culture in an online citizen science project: Programs, antiprograms and epistemic subjects.
    Kasperowski D; Hillman T
    Soc Stud Sci; 2018 Aug; 48(4):564-588. PubMed ID: 29792116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Co-creating a local environmental epidemiology study: the case of citizen science for investigating air pollution and related health risks in Barcelona, Spain.
    Gignac F; Righi V; Toran R; Errandonea LP; Ortiz R; Nieuwenhuijsen M; Creus J; Basagaña X; Balestrini M
    Environ Health; 2022 Jan; 21(1):11. PubMed ID: 35022033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenging the 'view from nowhere': citizen reflections on specialist expertise in a deliberative process.
    Davies G; Burgess J
    Health Place; 2004 Dec; 10(4):349-61. PubMed ID: 15491895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain.
    Buchman DZ; Ho A; Goldberg DS
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Mar; 14(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 28005251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.