374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35575251)
1. Stick or twist? Cost-effectiveness of siponimod compared with continuing existing disease-modifying therapies in the treatment of active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in the UK.
Montgomery S; Woodhouse F; Vudumula U; Gudala K; Duddy M; Kroes M
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):669-678. PubMed ID: 35575251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Siponimod Compared to Interferon Beta-1a in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis with Active Disease in Switzerland.
Schur N; Gudala K; Vudumula U; Vadapalle S; Bhadhuri A; Casanova A; Adlard N; Schwenkglenks M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2021 May; 39(5):563-577. PubMed ID: 33791945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.
Spelman T; Herring WL; Acosta C; Hyde R; Jokubaitis VG; Pucci E; Lugaresi A; Laureys G; Havrdova EK; Horakova D; Izquierdo G; Eichau S; Ozakbas S; Alroughani R; Kalincik T; Duquette P; Girard M; Petersen T; Patti F; Csepany T; Granella F; Grand'Maison F; Ferraro D; Karabudak R; Jose Sa M; Trojano M; van Pesch V; Van Wijmeersch B; Cartechini E; McCombe P; Gerlach O; Spitaleri D; Rozsa C; Hodgkinson S; Bergamaschi R; Gouider R; Soysal A; Castillo-Triviño ; Prevost J; Garber J; de Gans K; Ampapa R; Simo M; Sanchez-Menoyo JL; Iuliano G; Sas A; van der Walt A; John N; Gray O; Hughes S; De Luca G; Onofrj M; Buzzard K; Skibina O; Terzi M; Slee M; Solaro C; Oreja-Guevara ; Ramo-Tello C; Fragoso Y; Shaygannejad V; Moore F; Rajda C; Aguera Morales E; Butzkueven H
J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):109-125. PubMed ID: 38085684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis.
Zimmermann M; Brouwer E; Tice JA; Seidner M; Loos AM; Liu S; Chapman RH; Kumar V; Carlson JJ
CNS Drugs; 2018 Dec; 32(12):1145-1157. PubMed ID: 30141001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-utility of fingolimod compared with dimethyl fumarate in highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in England.
Maruszczak MJ; Montgomery SM; Griffiths MJ; Bergvall N; Adlard N
J Med Econ; 2015; 18(11):874-85. PubMed ID: 26055952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When does economic model type become a decisive factor in health technology appraisals? Learning from the expanding treatment options for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Noon KM; Montgomery SM; Adlard NE; Kroes MA
J Med Econ; 2018 Oct; 21(10):983-992. PubMed ID: 29923439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indirect comparisons of siponimod with fingolimod and ofatumumab in multiple sclerosis: assessing the feasibility of propensity score matching analyses.
Samjoo IA; Worthington E; Haltner A; Spin P; Drudge C; Cameron C; Brennan R; Dahlke F; Adlard N
Curr Med Res Opin; 2021 Nov; 37(11):1933-1944. PubMed ID: 34384311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analyses of natalizumab (Tysabri) compared with other disease-modifying therapies for people with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the UK.
Gani R; Giovannoni G; Bates D; Kemball B; Hughes S; Kerrigan J
Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(7):617-27. PubMed ID: 18563952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of baseline age and disease duration on the efficacy and safety of siponimod in patients with active SPMS: Post hoc analyses from the EXPAND study.
Hua LH; Bar-Or A; Cohan SL; Lublin FD; Coyle PK; Cree BA; Meng X; Su W; Cox GM; Fox RJ
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2023 Jul; 75():104766. PubMed ID: 37245350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of siponimod in the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in Italy.
Cortesi PA; Antonazzo IC; Gasperini C; Nica M; Ritrovato D; Mantovani LG
PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264123. PubMed ID: 35259168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-utility of First-line Disease-modifying Treatments for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
Soini E; Joutseno J; Sumelahti ML
Clin Ther; 2017 Mar; 39(3):537-557.e10. PubMed ID: 28209373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ocrelizumab versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis.
Yang H; Duchesneau E; Foster R; Guerin A; Ma E; Thomas NP
J Med Econ; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1056-1065. PubMed ID: 28703659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of siponimod and other disease modifying treatments in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Samjoo IA; Worthington E; Haltner A; Cameron C; Nicholas R; Rouyrre N; Dahlke F; Adlard N
Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Jul; 36(7):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 32220214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets, alemtuzumab, and natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with high disease activity in England.
Hettle R; Harty G; Wong SL
J Med Econ; 2018 Jul; 21(7):676-686. PubMed ID: 29618273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets versus fingolimod in patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis in Portugal.
Pinheiro B; Guerreiro R; Costa J; Miguel LS
J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):484-491. PubMed ID: 31951777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate for treating multiple sclerosis: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Melendez-Torres GJ; Auguste P; Armoiry X; Maheswaran H; Court R; Madan J; Kan A; Lin S; Counsell C; Patterson J; Rodrigues J; Ciccarelli O; Fraser H; Clarke A
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Sep; 21(52):1-352. PubMed ID: 28914229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Bozkaya D; Livingston T; Migliaccio-Walle K; Odom T
J Med Econ; 2017 Mar; 20(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 27822961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-utility analysis of alemtuzumab in comparison with interferon beta, fingolimod, and natalizumab treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Austria.
Walter E; Berger T; Bajer-Kornek B; Deisenhammer F
J Med Econ; 2019 Mar; 22(3):226-237. PubMed ID: 30522373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A discrete event simulation to model the cost-utility of fingolimod and natalizumab in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the UK.
Montgomery SM; Maruszczak MJ; Slater D; Kusel J; Nicholas R; Adlard N
J Med Econ; 2017 May; 20(5):474-482. PubMed ID: 28008769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term efficacy and safety of siponimod in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: Analysis of EXPAND core and extension data up to >5 years.
Cree BA; Arnold DL; Fox RJ; Gold R; Vermersch P; Benedict RH; Bar-Or A; Piani-Meier D; Rouyrre N; Ritter S; Kilaru A; Karlsson G; Giovannoni G; Kappos L
Mult Scler; 2022 Sep; 28(10):1591-1605. PubMed ID: 35380078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
