BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35577670)

  • 1. [Comparison of systematic, targeted and combined prostate biopsies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer with MRI lesion].
    Gander J; Guandalino M; Vedrine N; Charbonnel C; Gayrel P; Ceruti F; Guy L
    Prog Urol; 2022 Oct; 32(12):836-842. PubMed ID: 35577670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis.
    Avolio PP; Lughezzani G; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Uleri A; Frego N; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Saita A; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):832.e1-832.e7. PubMed ID: 34183255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies.
    Filson CP; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Huang J; Lieu P; Dorey FJ; Reiter RE; Marks LS
    Cancer; 2016 Mar; 122(6):884-92. PubMed ID: 26749141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgeon seniority and experience have no effect on CaP detection rates using MRI/TRUS fusion-guided targeted biopsies.
    Taha F; Larre S; Branchu B;
    Urol Oncol; 2024 Mar; 42(3):67.e1-67.e7. PubMed ID: 38245408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate cancer detection using magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy: A retrospective cohort study.
    Pratihar SK; Khanna A; Vasudeo V; Gupta R; Saurabh N; Kumar B; Ali M; Akotkar SS; Rawal SK; Singh A
    Indian J Urol; 2023; 39(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 38077193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic prostate biopsy still matters: A comprehensive analysis of MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies across different indications.
    Westhoff N; Baeßler B; von Hardenberg J; Hetjens S; Porubsky S; Siegel F; Martini T; Michel MS; Attenberger U; Ritter M
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):678-687. PubMed ID: 31375340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiparametric MRI-ultrasonography software fusion prostate biopsy: initial results using a stereotactic robotic-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy platform comparing systematic vs targeted biopsy.
    Lee AYM; Yang XY; Lee HJ; Law YM; Huang HH; Lau WKO; Lee LS; Ho HSS; Tay KJ; Cheng CWS; Yuen JSP; Chen K
    BJU Int; 2020 Nov; 126(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 32438463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Zhang J; Zhu A; Sun D; Guo S; Zhang H; Liu S; Fu Q; Zhang K
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(7):1698-1702. PubMed ID: 33565519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
    Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.
    Marks L; Young S; Natarajan S
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 23138468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trans-rectal ultrasound visibility of prostate lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging increases accuracy of image-fusion targeted biopsies.
    Ukimura O; Marien A; Palmer S; Villers A; Aron M; de Castro Abreu AL; Leslie S; Shoji S; Matsugasumi T; Gross M; Dasgupta P; Gill IS
    World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1669-76. PubMed ID: 25656687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Interest using 3D ultrasound and MRI fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection].
    Marien A; De Castro Abreu A; Gill I; Villers A; Ukimura O
    Prog Urol; 2017 Sep; 27(10):521-528. PubMed ID: 28629785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided In-bore and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsies: An Adjusted Comparison of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate.
    Costa DN; Goldberg K; Leon AD; Lotan Y; Xi Y; Aziz M; Freifeld Y; Margulis V; Raj G; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Desai N; Bagrodia A; Francis F; Pedrosa I; Cadeddu JA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Jul; 2(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 31277776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Fourcade A; Payrard C; Tissot V; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Demany N; Serey-Effeil S; Callerot P; Coquet JB; Doucet L; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Nonent M; Fournier G; Valeri A
    Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):174-179. PubMed ID: 29463177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-Bore Versus Fusion MRI-Targeted Biopsy of PI-RADS Category 4 and 5 Lesions: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis Using Propensity Score Weighting.
    Prince M; Foster BR; Kaempf A; Liu JJ; Amling CL; Isharwal S; Chen Y; Coakley FV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Nov; 217(5):1123-1130. PubMed ID: 33646819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initial experience of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion transperineal biopsy: Biopsy techniques and results for 75 patients.
    Tae JH; Shim JS; Jin HJ; Yoon SG; No TI; Kim JY; Kang SH; Cheon J; Kang SG
    Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Nov; 59(6):363-370. PubMed ID: 30402568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of systematic prostate biopsies when performing transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy with needle tracking-what is the additional value?
    Günzel K; Magheli A; Busch J; Baco E; Cash H; Heinrich S; Edler D; Schostak M; Borgmann H; Schlegel J; Hinz S
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Oct; 54(10):2477-2483. PubMed ID: 35877030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted versus three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsies: Size does matter.
    Peltier A; Aoun F; Albisinni S; Marcelis Q; Ledinh D; Paesmans M; Lemort M; van Velthoven R
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Jun; 50(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 26754860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of real-time elastography on magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies.
    Brock M; Löppenberg B; Roghmann F; Pelzer A; Dickmann M; Becker W; Martin-Seidel P; Sommerer F; Schenk L; Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; von Bodman C
    J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1191-7. PubMed ID: 25451832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are concurrent systematic cores needed at the time of targeted biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies?
    Albisinni S; Aoun F; Noel A; El Rassy E; Lemort M; Paesmans M; van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T; Peltier A
    Prog Urol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 29203158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.