These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35577845)

  • 1. Conceptual knowledge shapes visual working memory for complex visual information.
    Sims CR; Lerch RA; Tarduno JA; Jacobs RA
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8088. PubMed ID: 35577845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic influence on visual working memory of object identity and location.
    Hu R; Jacobs RA
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104891. PubMed ID: 34481197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Object-based encoding in visual working memory: A critical revisit.
    Gu Q; Dai A; Ye T; Huang B; Lu X; Shen M; Gao Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1397-1410. PubMed ID: 34609217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Massive Effects of Saliency on Information Processing in Visual Working Memory.
    Constant M; Liesefeld HR
    Psychol Sci; 2021 May; 32(5):682-691. PubMed ID: 33784490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual Working Memory Enhances the Neural Response to Matching Visual Input.
    Gayet S; Guggenmos M; Christophel TB; Haynes JD; Paffen CLE; Van der Stigchel S; Sterzer P
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(28):6638-6647. PubMed ID: 28592696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual working memory capacity does not modulate the feature-based information filtering in visual working memory.
    Zhou J; Yin J; Chen T; Ding X; Gao Z; Shen M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e23873. PubMed ID: 21957441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ventral fronto-parietal contributions to the disruption of visual working memory storage.
    Hakun JG; Ravizza SM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):783-793. PubMed ID: 26436710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive allocation of human visual working memory capacity during statistical and categorical learning.
    Bates CJ; Lerch RA; Sims CR; Jacobs RA
    J Vis; 2019 Feb; 19(2):11. PubMed ID: 30802280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus familiarity improves consolidation of visual working memory representations.
    Blalock LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1143-58. PubMed ID: 25720758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of top-down suppression in mitigating the disruptive effects of task-irrelevant feature changes in visual working memory.
    Bocincova A; van Lamsweerde AE; Johnson JS
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1411-1422. PubMed ID: 28741251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Categorical bias as a crucial parameter in visual working memory: The effect of memory load and retention interval.
    Zhou C; Lorist MM; Mathôt S
    Cortex; 2022 Sep; 154():311-321. PubMed ID: 35839573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The presence of semantic content in a visual recognition memory task reduces the severity of neglect.
    Moreh E; Zohary E; Orlov T
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 157():107860. PubMed ID: 33901565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Encoding strategies in self-initiated visual working memory.
    Magen H; Berger-Mandelbaum A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1093-1108. PubMed ID: 29948921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irrelevant features of distractors in intervening visual search tasks cause active visual working memory interference - the more difficult the search task, the more interference it causes.
    Lively Z; Ng GJP; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2410-2429. PubMed ID: 33977408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the flicker task to estimate visual working memory storage capacity.
    Pailian H; Simons DJ; Wetherhold J; Halberda J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1271-1289. PubMed ID: 31321648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
    Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual working memory impairs visual detection: A function of working memory load or sensory load?
    Guo Y; Liang J; Yao N; Shen M; Gao Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Dec; 47(12):1659-1672. PubMed ID: 34881951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Topological change induces an interference effect in visual working memory.
    Wei N; Zhou T; Zhuo Y; Chen L
    J Vis; 2021 Sep; 21(10):4. PubMed ID: 34473199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.