144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35578057)
1. Tantalum-specific contrast-to-noise ratio or conventional detector dose-driven exposure control in angiography: radiation dose and image quality evaluation in a porcine model.
Werncke T; Meine TC; Hinrichs JB; Maschke SK; Becker LS; Brüsch I; Rumpel R; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
Eur Radiol Exp; 2022 May; 6(1):24. PubMed ID: 35578057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of a contrast-to-noise ratio driven and material specific exposure control on image quality and radiation exposure in angiography.
Werncke T; Kemling M; Tashenov S; Hinrichs JB; Meine TC; Maschke SK; Kyriakou Y; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065020. PubMed ID: 33709957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of a contrast-to-noise ratio-driven exposure control and a regular detector dose-driven exposure control in abdominal imaging in a clinical angiography system.
Werncke T; Kemling M; Tashenov S; Hinrichs JB; Meine TC; Maschke SK; Kyriakou Y; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7641-7656. PubMed ID: 34651705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image Quality and Radiation Exposure in Abdominal Angiography: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Conventional Detector-Dose-Driven Versus Contrast-to-Noise Ratio-Driven Exposure Control at Various Source-to-Image Receptor Distances and Collimations in a Pilot Phantom and Animal Study.
Werncke T; Becker LS; Maschke SK; Hinrichs JB; Meine TCH; Dewald CLA; Brüsch I; Rumpel R; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
Invest Radiol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38529924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of image quality and patient exposure in fluoroscopy using a phantom: Is there any clinical relevance?
Tsalafoutas IA; Tsapaki V; Triantopoulou I
Eur J Radiol; 2021 May; 138():109607. PubMed ID: 33667936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advanced Robotic Angiography Systems for Image Guidance During Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization: Impact on Radiation Dose and Image Quality.
Vogl TJ; Alizadeh LS; Maeder R; Naguib NN; Herrmann E; Bickford MW; Burck I; Albrecht MH
Invest Radiol; 2019 Mar; 54(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 30444795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of Radiation Dose and Image Quality for Angiographic System with Spectral Shaping Filter].
Ichikawa N; Matsubara K; Fukuda A
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 30662028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dose reduction and static image quality assessment using a channelized hotelling observer on an angiography system upgraded with clarity IQ.
Ortenzia O; Trojani V; Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Iori M; Ghetti C
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Feb; 6(2):025008. PubMed ID: 33438634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functionality and operation of fluoroscopic automatic brightness control/automatic dose rate control logic in modern cardiovascular and interventional angiography systems: a report of Task Group 125 Radiography/Fluoroscopy Subcommittee, Imaging Physics Committee, Science Council.
Rauch P; Lin PJ; Balter S; Fukuda A; Goode A; Hartwell G; LaFrance T; Nickoloff E; Shepard J; Strauss K
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2826-8. PubMed ID: 22559654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dose reduction in cardiovascular CT angiography with iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D) in a swine model: a model of paediatric cardiac imaging.
Zhao P; Hou Y; Liu Q; Ma Y; Guo Q
Clin Radiol; 2016 Jul; 71(7):716.e7-716.e14. PubMed ID: 27180082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative performance evaluation of a flat detector and an image intensifier angiographic system both used for interventional cardiology procedures in adult and pediatric patients.
Kordolaimi SD; Salvara AL; Antonakos I; Tsalafoutas IA; Broutzos E; Efstathopoulos EP
Phys Med; 2013 Mar; 29(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 22398332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using the K-edge to improve contrast conspicuity and to lower radiation dose with a 16-MDCT: a phantom and human study.
Kalva SP; Sahani DV; Hahn PF; Saini S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 16778612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of patient entrance dose rate of interventional X-ray equipment].
Miyazaki S; Abe S; Katoh Y; Kobayashi H; Uehara H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jul; 59(7):839-47. PubMed ID: 12937405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of Radiation Dose Estimates and Image Quality Between Commercially Available Interventional Fluoroscopy Systems for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures.
Trunz LM; Eschelman DJ; Gonsalves CF; Adamo RD; Dave JK
Acad Radiol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1559-1569. PubMed ID: 32224035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of two interventional fluoroscope suites for cardiovascular imaging.
Anthony G; Liang Y; Zhao X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 23(10):e13741. PubMed ID: 35950644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significant dose reduction for pediatric digital subtraction angiography without impairing image quality: preclinical study in a piglet model.
Racadio J; Strauss K; Abruzzo T; Patel M; Kukreja K; Johnson N; den Hartog M; Hoornaert B; Nachabe R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):904-8. PubMed ID: 25247959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increased radiation dose by automatic exposure control system during fluoroscopy and angiography of pelvis due to contrast material in the bladder: experimental study.
Nakamura A; Ishiguchi T; Kamei S; Matsuda J; Ohno K; Murata K
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 15468942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient radiation dose during angiography and embolization for abdominal hemorrhage: the influence of CT angiography, fluoroscopy system, patient and procedural variables.
McCaughey C; Healy GM; Al Balushi H; Maher P; McCavana J; Lucey J; Cantwell CP
CVIR Endovasc; 2022 Feb; 5(1):12. PubMed ID: 35171363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
