These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35579251)

  • 1. Distinctive roles of mPFC subregions in forming impressions and guiding social interaction based on others' social behaviour.
    Lim G; Kim H
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 17(12):1118-1130. PubMed ID: 35579251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinctive Roles of Medial Prefrontal Cortex Subregions in Strategic Conformity to Social Hierarchy.
    Kim D; Kim J; Kim H
    J Neurosci; 2023 Sep; 43(36):6330-6341. PubMed ID: 37582627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Zheng Y; Guo X; Yang G
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():126-134. PubMed ID: 28223239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Zheng L; Guo X; Zhu L; Li J; Chen L; Dienes Z
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 10(3):461-6. PubMed ID: 24847114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural responses to unfairness and fairness depend on self-contribution to the income.
    Guo X; Zheng L; Cheng X; Chen M; Zhu L; Li J; Chen L; Yang Z
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 9(10):1498-505. PubMed ID: 23946001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accepting unfairness by a significant other is associated with reduced connectivity between medial prefrontal and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.
    Fatfouta R; Meshi D; Merkl A; Heekeren HR
    Soc Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 13(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 27813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the Ultimatum Game.
    Koenigs M; Tranel D
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(4):951-6. PubMed ID: 17251437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Not on my team: Medial prefrontal cortex responses to ingroup fusion and unfair monetary divisions.
    Apps MAJ; McKay R; Azevedo RT; Whitehouse H; Tsakiris M
    Brain Behav; 2018 Aug; 8(8):e01030. PubMed ID: 29931824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unfair? It depends: neural correlates of fairness in social context.
    Güroğlu B; van den Bos W; Rombouts SA; Crone EA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 5(4):414-23. PubMed ID: 20350933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
    Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interfering with activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex via TMS affects social impressions updating.
    Ferrari C; Vecchi T; Todorov A; Cattaneo Z
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):626-34. PubMed ID: 27012713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reciprocity and identity protection: reasons for rejection in the ultimatum game].
    Horita Y; Yamagishi T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Oct; 78(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 18027592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reward and social valuation deficits following ventromedial prefrontal damage.
    Moretti L; Dragone D; di Pellegrino G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):128-40. PubMed ID: 18476758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responding to unfair offers made by a friend: neuroelectrical activity changes in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex.
    Campanhã C; Minati L; Fregni F; Boggio PS
    J Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 31(43):15569-74. PubMed ID: 22031902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chimpanzees engage in competitive altruism in a triadic ultimatum game.
    Sánchez-Amaro A; Maurits L; Haun DBM
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3393. PubMed ID: 38336923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of emotion regulation and choice repetition bias in the ultimatum game.
    Chung JCY; Bhatoa RS; Kirkpatrick R; Woodcock KA
    Emotion; 2023 Jun; 23(4):925-936. PubMed ID: 36048029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value computations underlying human proposer behavior in the ultimatum game.
    Pulcu E; Haruno M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jan; 149(1):125-137. PubMed ID: 31157530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.