These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3557939)
1. The hasty British ban on commercial surrogacy. Brahams D Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Feb; 17(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 3557939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surrogacy, adoption, and custody. Brahams D Lancet; 1987 Apr; 1(8536):817. PubMed ID: 2882230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No primrose path. Surrogacy and the role of the criminal law. Chalmers DR Med Law; 1989; 7(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 2495399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surrogate motherhood contracts: should the British or Canadian model fill the U.S. legislative vacuum? Serratelli A George Washington J Int Law Econ; 1993; 26(3):633-74. PubMed ID: 11652952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The regulation of commercial surrogacy: The wrong answers to the wrong questions. Stuhmcke A J Law Med; 2015 Dec; 23(2):333-45. PubMed ID: 26939502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surrogacy -- Warnock and after. Foxcroft L Med Law Int; 1997; 2(4):337-55. PubMed ID: 11657579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Contracts to bear children. Davies I J Med Ethics; 1985 Jun; 11(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 4009634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Government acts to prohibit surrogacy arrangements. Deitch R Lancet; 1985 Apr; 1(8435):994-5. PubMed ID: 2859460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wombs for rent: an examination of prohibitory and regulatory approaches to governing preconception arrangements. Chen M Health Law Can; 2003 Feb; 23(3):33-50. PubMed ID: 12674583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A civil liberties analysis of surrogacy arrangements. Gostin L Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 3060686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report. Gillon R Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The debate on surrogate motherhood: the current situation, some arguments and issues; questions facing law and policy. Harding LM J Soc Welfare Law; 1987 Jan; 1987():37-63. PubMed ID: 16998990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ending commercial surrogacy in India: significance of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016. Timms O Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 29550749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The new Portuguese law on surrogacy - The story of how a promising law does not really regulate surrogacy arrangements. Raposo VL JBRA Assist Reprod; 2017 Sep; 21(3):230-239. PubMed ID: 28837033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surrogacy to be reviewed in United Kingdom. Warden J BMJ; 1997 Jun; 314(7097):1782. PubMed ID: 11644946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. COMMERCIAL SURROGACY: WHAT ROLE FOR LAW IN AUSTRALIA? Sifris R; Ludlow K; Sifris A J Law Med; 2015 Dec; 23(2):275-96. PubMed ID: 26939494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surrogacy: a commercial proposition? Nolan M Pract Midwife; 1998 Apr; 1(4):14-7. PubMed ID: 10392128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. British panel grapples with IVF issue, proposes legislation, surrogacy ban. Med World News; 1984 Aug; 25(15):28. PubMed ID: 11645522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. (Mis)regulation--the case of commercial surrogacy. Mahajan T Indian J Med Ethics; 2015; 12(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25716437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]