79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3557940)
1. At law. Transferring the ethical hot potato.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Feb; 17(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 3557940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prisoner in the ICU: the tragedy of William Bartling.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Dec; 14(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 6511377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988 Dec; 18(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 3147972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When procedures limit rights: from Quinlan to Conroy.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 4008237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical ethics in the courtroom: the need for scrutiny.
Pellegrino ED; Sharpe VA
Perspect Biol Med; 1989; 32(4):547-64. PubMed ID: 2674888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Elizabeth Bouvia: whose space is this anyway?
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 3084400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Brophy v New England Sinai Hospital, Inc. Brief amicus curiae, Society for the Right to Die, Inc. on behalf of appellant.
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1987 Jul; 35(7):669-78. PubMed ID: 3584770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do feeding tubes have more rights than patients?
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 3082798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fashion and freedom: when artificial feeding should be withdrawn.
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 1985 Jun; 75(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 3923847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
Crook RR
Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The patient who refuses medical treatment: a dilemma for hospitals and physicians.
Swartz M
Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(2):147-94. PubMed ID: 3915420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bartling v. Superior Court.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 3850084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
Chrisman JP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The case of Elizabeth Bouvia: a strain on our ethical reasoning.
Bayley C
Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):40-7, 86. PubMed ID: 10311605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ironies and tensions in feeding the dying.
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 6438020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics committees in the courts.
Wolf SM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Jun; 16(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 3721842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decision making in the critically ill patient.
Beechler CR; Steinmetz PT
Prim Care; 1985 Jun; 12(2):341-52. PubMed ID: 3848024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
