These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3557966)

  • 1. The chief scientist reports ... a prospective evaluation of the Bjork-Shiley, Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
    Miller HC; Bloomfield P; Kitchin AH; Wheatley DJ; Walbaum PR; Lutz W
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1987 Jan; 45(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 3557966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve replacements].
    Mühlberger V; Schistek R; Hopferwieser T; Schwaiger A; Scharfetter H; Knapp E
    Z Kardiol; 1986 Jun; 75(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 3751218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.
    Joyce LD; Nelson RM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards valves. A comparative analysis.
    Nashef SA; Sethia B; Turner MA; Davidson KG; Lewis S; Bain WH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Mar; 93(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 3821149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro assessment of mitral valve prostheses.
    Walker DK; Scotten LN; Modi VJ; Brownlee RT
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 May; 79(5):680-8. PubMed ID: 7366235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reece IJ; Fisher J; Sethia B; MacArthur KJ; Wheatley DJ
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves.
    Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis--new generation biological valve.
    Jamieson WR; Gerein AN; Tyers GF; Allen P; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Janusz MT; Burr LH
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():245-50. PubMed ID: 3727695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
    Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture of the wire stent in a Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.
    Griffin S; Bouboulis N; Holden MP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 May; 2(3):357-8. PubMed ID: 8269133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current status of valve replacement in children.
    Schaff HV; Danielson GK
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1986; 16(2):427-36. PubMed ID: 3742534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The necessity of reoperation for patients with Bjork-Shiley, St Jude Medical, Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards prostheses.
    Morishita Y; Toyohira H; Yuda T; Umebayashi Y; Saigenji H; Hashiguchi M; Uehara K; Taira A
    Jpn J Surg; 1990 Jul; 20(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 2388440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term comparative analysis of the Björk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975.
    Martinell J; Fraile J; Artiz V; Moreno J; Rábago G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 4058046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Has altered design affected performance?
    Wilson ES; Jamieson MP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 8834724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
    Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The behavior of pericardial versus porcine valve xenografts in the growing sheep model.
    Gallo I; Nistal F; Artiñano E; Fernández D; Cayón R; Carrión M; García-Martínez V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 3807402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
    Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR; David TE; Feindel CM; Miyagishima RT; Germann E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI; Miller DC
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
    Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.