These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35580401)

  • 21. Pedestrian injuries from cars and SUVs: Updated crash outcomes from the vulnerable road user injury prevention alliance (VIPA).
    Monfort SS; Mueller BC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S165-S167. PubMed ID: 33147075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of automated emergency braking system's avoidance of pedestrian crashes at intersections under occluded conditions within a virtual simulator.
    Abdel-Aty M; Cai Q; Wu Y; Zheng O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106797. PubMed ID: 35964393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating automated emergency braking performance in simulated car-to-two-wheeler crashes in China: A comparison between C-NCAP tests and in-depth crash data.
    Sui B; Lubbe N; Bärgman J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106229. PubMed ID: 34225169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 27586101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relationship of pedestrian crash types and passenger vehicle types.
    Hu W; Cicchino JB
    J Safety Res; 2022 Sep; 82():392-401. PubMed ID: 36031269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analyzing pedestrian crash injury severity at signalized and non-signalized locations.
    Haleem K; Alluri P; Gan A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():14-23. PubMed ID: 25935426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Are front crash prevention systems less effective at preventing rear-end crashes where trucks and motorcycles are struck?
    Cicchino JB; Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 38466620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Real-world effects of rear automatic braking and other backing assistance systems.
    Cicchino JB
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():41-47. PubMed ID: 30876519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simulating Automated Emergency Braking with and without Torricelli Vacuum Emergency Braking for cyclists: Effect of brake deceleration and sensor field-of-view on accidents, injuries and fatalities.
    Jeppsson H; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105538. PubMed ID: 32470821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes.
    Sander U; Lubbe N; Pietzsch S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S119-S125. PubMed ID: 31381448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effectiveness of lane departure warning systems-A reduction in real-world passenger car injury crashes.
    Sternlund S; Strandroth J; Rizzi M; Lie A; Tingvall C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Feb; 18(2):225-229. PubMed ID: 27624313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Real-world effects of rear cross-traffic alert on police-reported backing crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():350-355. PubMed ID: 30580146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comprehensive study of child pedestrian crash outcomes in Ghana.
    Adanu EK; Dzinyela R; Agyemang W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 189():107146. PubMed ID: 37285755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking in car-to-cyclist accidents in France.
    Chajmowicz H; Saadé J; Cuny S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S20-S25. PubMed ID: 31750740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of the effect of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) based on real-world crashes.
    Piantini S; Aathresh VN; Savino G; Pierini M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S174-S180. PubMed ID: 36200698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Integrated assessment of pedestrian head impact protection in testing secondary safety and autonomous emergency braking.
    Searson DJ; Anderson RW; Hutchinson TP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Feb; 63():1-8. PubMed ID: 24246294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trends in school-age pedestrian and pedalcyclist crashes in the USA: 26 states, 2000-2014.
    Wheeler-Martin KC; Curry AE; Metzger KB; DiMaggio CJ
    Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 26(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31562195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Crash and injury prevention estimates for intersection driver assistance systems in left turn across path/opposite direction crashes in the United States.
    Bareiss M; Scanlon J; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S133-S138. PubMed ID: 31381453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fatal pedestrian crashes on interstates and other freeways in the United States.
    Wang J; Cicchino JB
    J Safety Res; 2020 Sep; 74():1-7. PubMed ID: 32951769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How can front crash prevention systems address more police-reported crashes in the United States?
    Kidd DG; Teoh ER; Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107199. PubMed ID: 37406545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.