144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35580451)
1. Informationally redundant utterances elicit pragmatic inferences.
Kravtchenko E; Demberg V
Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105159. PubMed ID: 35580451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What's new? A comprehension bias in favor of informativity.
Rohde H; Futrell R; Lucas CG
Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104491. PubMed ID: 33545512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions.
Schuster S; Degen J
Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104285. PubMed ID: 32535344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Information Integration in Modulation of Pragmatic Inferences During Online Language Comprehension.
Ryskin R; Kurumada C; Brown-Schmidt S
Cogn Sci; 2019 Aug; 43(8):e12769. PubMed ID: 31446652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The neural integration of speaker and message.
Van Berkum JJ; van den Brink D; Tesink CM; Kos M; Hagoort P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):580-91. PubMed ID: 18052777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Four-year-olds incorporate speaker knowledge into pragmatic inferences.
Kampa A; Papafragou A
Dev Sci; 2020 May; 23(3):e12920. PubMed ID: 31693776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. This Better Be Interesting: A Speaker's Decision to Speak Cues Listeners to Expect Informative Content.
Rohde H; Hoek J; Keshev M; Franke M
Open Mind (Camb); 2022; 6():118-131. PubMed ID: 36439071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gricean Expectations in Online Sentence Comprehension: An ERP Study on the Processing of Scalar Inferences.
Augurzky P; Franke M; Ulrich R
Cogn Sci; 2019 Aug; 43(8):e12776. PubMed ID: 31446651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pragmatics in understanding what is said.
Gibbs RW; Moise JF
Cognition; 1997 Jan; 62(1):51-74. PubMed ID: 8997170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference.
Goodman ND; Frank MC
Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 20(11):818-829. PubMed ID: 27692852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extending Situated Language Comprehension (Accounts) with Speaker and Comprehender Characteristics: Toward Socially Situated Interpretation.
Münster K; Knoeferle P
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2267. PubMed ID: 29416517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of pronoun anaphora and speaker mood in the interpretation of conversational utterances by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients.
Brownell HH; Carroll JJ; Rehak A; Wingfield A
Brain Lang; 1992 Jul; 43(1):121-47. PubMed ID: 1643507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preschoolers modulate contrastive inferences during online language comprehension.
Ju N; Williams N; Sedivy J; Chambers CG; Graham SA
Child Dev; 2023; 94(5):1319-1329. PubMed ID: 36967654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Online pragmatic interpretations of scalar adjectives are affected by perceived speaker reliability.
Gardner B; Dix S; Lawrence R; Morgan C; Sullivan A; Kurumada C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245130. PubMed ID: 33606683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pragmatics and social meaning: Understanding under-informativeness in native and non-native speakers.
Fairchild S; Mathis A; Papafragou A
Cognition; 2020 Jul; 200():104171. PubMed ID: 32244064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overlapping Mechanisms in Implying and Inferring.
Rees A; Bott L
Cogn Sci; 2020 Jan; 44(1):e12808. PubMed ID: 31960504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation.
Gibson E; Bergen L; Piantadosi ST
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 May; 110(20):8051-6. PubMed ID: 23637344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Role of Prosody in Disambiguating English Indirect Requests.
Trott S; Reed S; Kaliblotzky D; Ferreira V; Bergen B
Lang Speech; 2023 Mar; 66(1):118-142. PubMed ID: 35422153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of Disfluency in Online Interpretation of Deception.
Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1434-1456. PubMed ID: 27246116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
