These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35580529)

  • 1. Attractiveness and preferences for redistribution.
    Fazio A
    Econ Hum Biol; 2022 Aug; 46():101145. PubMed ID: 35580529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beauty at the ballot box: disease threats predict preferences for physically attractive leaders.
    White AE; Kenrick DT; Neuberg SL
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2429-36. PubMed ID: 24121414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs.
    Peterson RD; Palmer CL
    Politics Life Sci; 2017; 36(2):3-16. PubMed ID: 29355104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Body shape preferences: associations with rater body shape and sociosexuality.
    Price ME; Pound N; Dunn J; Hopkins S; Kang J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52532. PubMed ID: 23300976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of attractiveness on food sharing preferences in human mating markets.
    Stirrat M; Gumert M; Perrett D
    Evol Psychol; 2011 Mar; 9(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 22947957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beauty perks: Physical appearance, earnings, and fringe benefits.
    Dilmaghani M
    Econ Hum Biol; 2020 Aug; 38():100889. PubMed ID: 32485638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Tsai CH; Yen NS; Chen AL; Lin WC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148643. PubMed ID: 26886266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brahmin Left versus Merchant Right? Education, class, multiparty competition, and redistribution in Western Europe.
    Abou-Chadi T; Hix S
    Br J Sociol; 2021 Jan; 72(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 33629741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution.
    Ranehill E; Weber RA
    Exp Econ; 2022; 25(3):845-875. PubMed ID: 35673601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More than self-interest: Why different classes have different attitudes to income inequality.
    Langsaether PE; Evans G
    Br J Sociol; 2020 Sep; 71(4):594-607. PubMed ID: 32141060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of signalling tax evasion on redistribution and voting preferences: Evidence from the Panama Papers.
    Ait Bihi Ouali L
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229394. PubMed ID: 32155170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vocal Attractiveness Matters: Social Preferences in Cooperative Behavior.
    Shang J; Liu Z
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():877530. PubMed ID: 35693505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-rated attractiveness predicts preferences for sexually dimorphic facial characteristics in a culturally diverse sample.
    Marcinkowska UM; Jones BC; Lee AJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10905. PubMed ID: 34035393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Median voter dynamics in a laboratory experiment on voting over redistribution.
    Sauermann J
    Soc Sci Res; 2023 Mar; 111():102869. PubMed ID: 36898788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beauty premium: Event-related potentials evidence of how physical attractiveness matters in online peer-to-peer lending.
    Jin J; Fan B; Dai S; Ma Q
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Feb; 640():130-135. PubMed ID: 28111351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactions among the effects of head orientation, emotional expression, and physical attractiveness on face preferences.
    Main JC; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Jones BC
    Perception; 2010; 39(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 20301847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics.
    Jones AL; Kramer RS; Ward R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2060-8. PubMed ID: 24670156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election.
    Berthet V; Dorin C; Vergnaud JC; de Gardelle V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229096. PubMed ID: 32176697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.