BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3558079)

  • 1. Effects of nonadherent dressing materials on the healing of open wounds in dogs.
    Lee AH; Swaim SF; McGuire JA; Hughes KS
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1987 Feb; 190(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 3558079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Healing of porcine donor sites covered with silver-coated dressings.
    Olson ME; Wright JB; Lam K; Burrell RE
    Eur J Surg; 2000 Jun; 166(6):486-9. PubMed ID: 10890546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of a hydrolyzed collagen dressing on the healing of open wounds in dogs.
    Swaim SF; Gillette RL; Sartin EA; Hinkle SH; Coolman SL
    Am J Vet Res; 2000 Dec; 61(12):1574-8. PubMed ID: 11131601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled trial of the absorbency of four dressings and their effects on the evaporation of burn wounds.
    Chen J; Han CM; Su GL; Tang ZJ; Su SJ; Lin XW
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(20):1788-91. PubMed ID: 18028772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing.
    Weber RS; Hankins P; Limitone E; Callender D; Frankenthaler RM; Wolf P; Goepfert H
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Oct; 121(10):1145-9. PubMed ID: 7546582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of three occlusive dressing materials on healing of full-thickness skin wounds in dogs.
    Ramsey DT; Pope ER; Wagner-Mann C; Berg JN; Swaim SF
    Am J Vet Res; 1995 Jul; 56(7):941-9. PubMed ID: 7574165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a porous bovine collagen membrane bandage for management of wounds in horses.
    Yvorchuk-St Jean K; Gaughan E; St Jean G; Frank R
    Am J Vet Res; 1995 Dec; 56(12):1663-7. PubMed ID: 8599530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dressings, bandages, and splints for wound management in dogs and cats.
    Campbell BG
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2006 Jul; 36(4):759-91. PubMed ID: 16787787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cefazolin concentration in surgically created wounds treated with negative pressure wound therapy compared to surgically created wounds treated with nonadherent wound dressings.
    Coutin JV; Lanz OI; Magnin-Bissel GC; Ehrich MF; Miller EI; Werre SR; Riegel TO
    Vet Surg; 2015 Jan; 44(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 24962470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of wound dressings on full-thickness wounds in micropigs.
    Gokoo C; Burhop K
    Decubitus; 1993 Sep; 6(5):42-3, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 8286020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of bandaging on second intention healing of wounds of the distal limb in horses.
    Dart AJ; Perkins NR; Dart CM; Jeffcott LB; Canfield P
    Aust Vet J; 2009 Jun; 87(6):215-8. PubMed ID: 19489777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of occlusive and semi-occlusive dressings on the healing of acute full-thickness skin wounds on the forelimbs of dogs.
    Morgan PW; Binnington AG; Miller CW; Smith DA; Valliant A; Prescott JF
    Vet Surg; 1994; 23(6):494-502. PubMed ID: 7871713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Topical petrolatum gel alone versus topical silver sulfadiazine with standard gauze dressings for the treatment of superficial partial thickness burns in adults: a randomized controlled trial.
    Genuino GA; Baluyut-Angeles KV; Espiritu AP; Lapitan MC; Buckley BS
    Burns; 2014 Nov; 40(7):1267-73. PubMed ID: 25172229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wound Care.
    Balsa IM; Culp WT
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2015 Sep; 45(5):1049-65. PubMed ID: 26022525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of dressings and bandages in equine wound management.
    Gomez JH; Hanson RR
    Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract; 2005 Apr; 21(1):91-104, vii. PubMed ID: 15691602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study.
    Kaiser D; Hafner J; Mayer D; French LE; Läuchli S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 26(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 23337646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical trial comparing 3 different wound dressings for the management of partial-thickness skin graft donor sites.
    Fernandes de Carvalho V; Paggiaro AO; Isaac C; Gringlas J; Ferreira MC
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2011; 38(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 22011820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemicellulose dressing versus rayon dressing in the re-epithelialization of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a multicenter study.
    Ferreira LM; Blanes L; Gragnani A; Veiga DF; Veiga FP; Nery GB; Rocha GH; Gomes HC; Rocha MG; Okamoto R
    J Tissue Viability; 2009 Aug; 18(3):88-94. PubMed ID: 19596580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of equine amnion and a nonadherent wound dressing material for bandaging pinch-grafted wounds in ponies.
    Goodrich LR; Moll HD; Crisman MV; Lessard P; Bigbie RB
    Am J Vet Res; 2000 Mar; 61(3):326-9. PubMed ID: 10714527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.