360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3558079)
21. Prospective randomised controlled trial of nanocrystalline silver dressing versus plain gauze as the initial post-debridement management of military wounds on wound microbiology and healing.
Fries CA; Ayalew Y; Penn-Barwell JG; Porter K; Jeffery SL; Midwinter MJ
Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1111-6. PubMed ID: 24485549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interpenetrating polymer network wound dressing versus petrolatum following facial CO2 laser resurfacing: a bilateral comparison.
Weiss RA; Goldman MP
Dermatol Surg; 2001 May; 27(5):449-51. PubMed ID: 11359492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of occlusive dressings for management of full-thickness excisional wounds on the distal portion of the limbs of horses.
Howard RD; Stashak TS; Baxter GM
Am J Vet Res; 1993 Dec; 54(12):2150-4. PubMed ID: 8116952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Negative pressure wound therapy, silver coated foam dressing and conventional bandages in open wound treatment in dogs. A retrospective comparison of 50 paired cases.
Nolff MC; Fehr M; Bolling A; Dening R; Kramer S; Reese S; Meyer-Lindenberg A
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 25449799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Novel extracellular matrix wound dressing shows increased epithelialization of full-thickness skin wounds in dogs.
Kierski KR; Buote NJ; Rishniw M; Ray S; Demeter A
Am J Vet Res; 2023 Sep; 84(9):. PubMed ID: 37391191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of wound shape on wound contraction in horses.
Madison JB; Gronwall RR
Am J Vet Res; 1992 Sep; 53(9):1575-8. PubMed ID: 1416358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interface dressings influence the delivery of topical negative-pressure therapy.
Jones SM; Banwell PE; Shakespeare PG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 116(4):1023-8. PubMed ID: 16163089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of commercially available foam pipe insulation as a protective device for wounds over the elbow joint area in five dogs.
Pavletic MM
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2011 Nov; 239(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 21999796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Experimental in vitro evaluation of the absorption capacity and control of exudate of 3 wound healing dressings].
Torra i Bou JE; Cortés i Borra A; Manresa i Domínguez JM
Rev Enferm; 1998 Oct; 21(242):suppl 2-8. PubMed ID: 10030154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Taking the trauma out of wound care: the importance of undisturbed healing.
Rippon M; Davies P; White R
J Wound Care; 2012 Aug; 21(8):359-60, 362, 364-8. PubMed ID: 22885308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. OUTCOME OF FOAM VERSUS GAUZE DRESSINGS IN NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE TRAUMATIC WOUNDS WITH SOFT TISSUE LOSS AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
Ondieki JG; Khainga SO; Owilla F; Nangole FW
East Afr Med J; 2012 Jul; 89(7):230-40. PubMed ID: 26845802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of donor-site healing under Xeroform and Jelonet dressings: unexpected findings.
Malpass KG; Snelling CF; Tron V
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Aug; 112(2):430-9. PubMed ID: 12900600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A retrospective review of burn dressings on a porcine burn model.
Wang XQ; Kravchuk O; Kimble RM
Burns; 2010 Aug; 36(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 19864074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The influence of dressings on the healing of normal and ischaemic wounds and flap survival.
Quirinia A; Viidik A
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2001 Mar; 35(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11291341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of 3 biologic dressings on healing of cutaneous wounds on the limbs of horses.
Gomez JH; Schumacher J; Lauten SD; Sartin EA; Hathcock TL; Swaim SF
Can J Vet Res; 2004 Jan; 68(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 14979435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing the Vancouver Scar Scale with the cutometer in the assessment of donor site wounds treated with various dressings in a randomized trial.
Rennekampff HO; Rabbels J; Reinhard V; Becker ST; Schaller HE
J Burn Care Res; 2006; 27(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16679905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Moist dressing coverage supports proliferation and migration of transplanted skin micrografts in full-thickness porcine wounds.
Hackl F; Kiwanuka E; Philip J; Gerner P; Aflaki P; Diaz-Siso JR; Sisk G; Caterson EJ; Junker JP; Eriksson E
Burns; 2014 Mar; 40(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 23838078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Occlusive dressing versus petroleum gauze on drainage wounds.
Alsbjörn BF; Ovesen H; Walther-Larsen S
Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Mar; 156(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 2336914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Using a new lipidocolloid dressing in paediatric wounds: results of French and German clinical studies.
Letouze A; Voinchet V; Hoecht B; Muenter KC; Vives R; Bohbot S
J Wound Care; 2004 Jun; 13(6):221-5. PubMed ID: 15214139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Randomized clinical trial of donor-site wound dressings after split-skin grafting.
Brölmann FE; Eskes AM; Goslings JC; Niessen FB; de Bree R; Vahl AC; Pierik EG; Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT;
Br J Surg; 2013 Apr; 100(5):619-27. PubMed ID: 23460253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
