These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35580807)

  • 1. Reliability and subject specificity of personalized whole-brain dynamical models.
    Domhof JWM; Eickhoff SB; Popovych OV
    Neuroimage; 2022 Aug; 257():119321. PubMed ID: 35580807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-subject and inter-parcellation variability of resting-state whole-brain dynamical modeling.
    Popovych OV; Jung K; Manos T; Diaz-Pier S; Hoffstaedter F; Schreiber J; Yeo BTT; Eickhoff SB
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 236():118201. PubMed ID: 34033913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using connectomics for predictive assessment of brain parcellations.
    Albers KJ; Ambrosen KS; Liptrot MG; Dyrby TB; Schmidt MN; Mørup M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Sep; 238():118170. PubMed ID: 34087365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability modelling of resting-state functional connectivity.
    Teeuw J; Hulshoff Pol HE; Boomsma DI; Brouwer RM
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117842. PubMed ID: 33581291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.
    Mejia AF; Nebel MB; Barber AD; Choe AS; Pekar JJ; Caffo BS; Lindquist MA
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():478-491. PubMed ID: 29391241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation and validation of individualized dynamic brain models with resting state fMRI.
    Singh MF; Braver TS; Cole MW; Ching S
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117046. PubMed ID: 32603858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.
    Liégeois R; Laumann TO; Snyder AZ; Zhou J; Yeo BTT
    Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():437-455. PubMed ID: 28916180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tractography density affects whole-brain structural architecture and resting-state dynamical modeling.
    Jung K; Eickhoff SB; Popovych OV
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118176. PubMed ID: 34000399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whole-brain modelling of resting state fMRI differentiates ADHD subtypes and facilitates stratified neuro-stimulation therapy.
    Iravani B; Arshamian A; Fransson P; Kaboodvand N
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117844. PubMed ID: 33577937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stability and similarity of the pediatric connectome as developmental measures.
    Vanderwal T; Eilbott J; Kelly C; Frew SR; Woodward TS; Milham MP; Castellanos FX
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117537. PubMed ID: 33186720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SPARK: Sparsity-based analysis of reliable k-hubness and overlapping network structure in brain functional connectivity.
    Lee K; Lina JM; Gotman J; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():434-449. PubMed ID: 27046111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resting state dynamics meets anatomical structure: Temporal multiple kernel learning (tMKL) model.
    Surampudi SG; Misra J; Deco G; Bapi RS; Sharma A; Roy D
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():609-620. PubMed ID: 30267857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Boost in Test-Retest Reliability in Resting State fMRI with Predictive Modeling.
    Taxali A; Angstadt M; Rutherford S; Sripada C
    Cereb Cortex; 2021 May; 31(6):2822-2833. PubMed ID: 33447841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction and classification of sleep quality based on phase synchronization related whole-brain dynamic connectivity using resting state fMRI.
    Zhou Z; Cai B; Zhang G; Zhang A; Calhoun VD; Wang YP
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117190. PubMed ID: 32711063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resting state networks in empirical and simulated dynamic functional connectivity.
    Glomb K; Ponce-Alvarez A; Gilson M; Ritter P; Deco G
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():388-402. PubMed ID: 28782678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parcellation-induced variation of empirical and simulated brain connectomes at group and subject levels.
    Domhof JWM; Jung K; Eickhoff SB; Popovych OV
    Netw Neurosci; 2021; 5(3):798-830. PubMed ID: 34746628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The functional and structural connectomes associated with geriatric depression and anxiety symptoms in mild cognitive impairment: Cross-syndrome overlap and generalization.
    Yu J; Rawtaer I; Feng L; Kua EH; Mahendran R
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2021 Aug; 110():110329. PubMed ID: 33865926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional Connectivity's Degenerate View of Brain Computation.
    Marrelec G; Messé A; Giron A; Rudrauf D
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Oct; 12(10):e1005031. PubMed ID: 27736900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unique Mapping of Structural and Functional Connectivity on Cognition.
    Zimmermann J; Griffiths JD; McIntosh AR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9658-9667. PubMed ID: 30249801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring the dynamical effects of stroke lesions through whole-brain modeling.
    Idesis S; Favaretto C; Metcalf NV; Griffis JC; Shulman GL; Corbetta M; Deco G
    Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 36():103233. PubMed ID: 36272340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.