These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35584189)

  • 1. Negative feedback may suppress variation to improve collective foraging performance.
    Reina A; Marshall JAR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 May; 18(5):e1010090. PubMed ID: 35584189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative feedback enables fast and flexible collective decision-making in ants.
    Grüter C; Schürch R; Czaczkes TJ; Taylor K; Durance T; Jones SM; Ratnieks FL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44501. PubMed ID: 22984518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to not get stuck-negative feedback due to crowding maintains flexibility in ant foraging.
    Czaczkes TJ
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Nov; 360():172-180. PubMed ID: 25034339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative feedback in ants: crowding results in less trail pheromone deposition.
    Czaczkes TJ; Grüter C; Ratnieks FL
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Apr; 10(81):20121009. PubMed ID: 23365196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ant foraging on complex trails: route learning and the role of trail pheromones in Lasius niger.
    Czaczkes TJ; Grüter C; Ellis L; Wood E; Ratnieks FL
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Jan; 216(Pt 2):188-97. PubMed ID: 22972897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Insect communication: 'no entry' signal in ant foraging.
    Robinson EJ; Jackson DE; Holcombe M; Ratnieks FL
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7067):442. PubMed ID: 16306981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.
    Wendt S; Kleinhoelting N; Czaczkes TJ
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Feb; 17(163):20190661. PubMed ID: 32093538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulation of harvester ant foraging as a closed-loop excitable system.
    Pagliara R; Gordon DM; Leonard NE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1006200. PubMed ID: 30513076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying robustness in the regulation of collective foraging of ant colonies using an interaction-based model with backward bifurcation.
    Udiani O; Pinter-Wollman N; Kang Y
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Feb; 367():61-75. PubMed ID: 25484006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How patrollers set foraging direction in harvester ants.
    Greene MJ; Gordon DM
    Am Nat; 2007 Dec; 170(6):943-8. PubMed ID: 18171176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Synergy between social and private information increases foraging efficiency in ants.
    Czaczkes TJ; Grüter C; Jones SM; Ratnieks FL
    Biol Lett; 2011 Aug; 7(4):521-4. PubMed ID: 21325309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coupled information networks drive honeybee (Apis mellifera) collective foraging.
    Hasenjager MJ; Hoppitt W; Cunningham-Eurich I; Franks VR; Leadbeater E
    J Anim Ecol; 2024 Jan; 93(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 38009606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The physiology of forager hydration and variation among harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) colonies in collective foraging behavior.
    Friedman DA; Greene MJ; Gordon DM
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):5126. PubMed ID: 30914705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An agent-based model to investigate the roles of attractive and repellent pheromones in ant decision making during foraging.
    Robinson EJ; Ratnieks FL; Holcombe M
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Nov; 255(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 18778716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A fungus infected environment does not alter the behaviour of foraging ants.
    Pereira H; Willeput R; Detrain C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23573. PubMed ID: 34876627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diverse stochasticity leads a colony of ants to optimal foraging.
    Shiraishi M; Takeuchi R; Nakagawa H; Nishimura SI; Awazu A; Nishimori H
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Mar; 465():7-16. PubMed ID: 30629963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual crop loads provide local control for collective food intake in ant colonies.
    Greenwald EE; Baltiansky L; Feinerman O
    Elife; 2018 Mar; 7():. PubMed ID: 29506650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task-specific expression of the foraging gene in harvester ants.
    Ingram KK; Oefner P; Gordon DM
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Mar; 14(3):813-8. PubMed ID: 15723672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions Increase Forager Availability and Activity in Harvester Ants.
    Pless E; Queirolo J; Pinter-Wollman N; Crow S; Allen K; Mathur MB; Gordon DM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141971. PubMed ID: 26539724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The rewards of restraint in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ant colonies.
    Gordon DM
    Nature; 2013 Jun; 498(7452):91-3. PubMed ID: 23676676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.