These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3558440)

  • 1. Tissue biocompatibility of kevlar aramid fibers and polymethylmethacrylate, composites in rabbits.
    Henderson JD; Mullarky RH; Ryan DE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Jan; 21(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 3558440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Estimation of biocompatibility of fibers with large mechanical resistance].
    Zywicka B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(3):3-48. PubMed ID: 15631154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of placement of glass fibers and aramid fibers on the fracture resistance of provisional restorative materials.
    Saygili G; Sahmali SM; Demirel F
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 12540123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro and in vivo characterization of synthetic polymer/biopolymer composites.
    Gilbert DL; Lyman DJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 May; 21(5):643-55. PubMed ID: 3584168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary biocompatibility screening of several biodegradable phosphate fiber reinforced polymers.
    Andriano KP; Daniels AU; Smutz WP; Wyatt RW
    J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10148351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 12 month in vivo study on the response of bone to a hydroxyapatite-polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty composite.
    Itokawa H; Hiraide T; Moriya M; Fujimoto M; Nagashima G; Suzuki R; Fujimoto T
    Biomaterials; 2007 Nov; 28(33):4922-7. PubMed ID: 17707904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel botryoidal aramid fiber reinforcement of a PMMA resin for a restorative biomaterial.
    He X; Qu Y; Peng J; Peng T; Qian Z
    Biomater Sci; 2017 Mar; 5(4):808-816. PubMed ID: 28275764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. All-aramid composites by partial fiber dissolution.
    Zhang JM; Mousavi Z; Soykeabkaew N; Smith P; Nishino T; Peijs T
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2010 Mar; 2(3):919-26. PubMed ID: 20356299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of poly(DTH carbonate), a tyrosine-derived degradable polymer, for orthopedic applications.
    Ertel SI; Kohn J; Zimmerman MC; Parsons JR
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Nov; 29(11):1337-48. PubMed ID: 8582902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative analysis of tissue reaction to acrylic resin materials in studies on Wistar strain rats].
    Sobolewska E
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1999; 45():253-64. PubMed ID: 10909494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of in vivo properties of hydroxyapatite-polyhydroxybutyrate composites assessed for bone substitution.
    Carlo EC; Borges AP; Del Carlo RJ; Martinez MM; Oliveira PM; Morato GO; Eleotério RB; Reis Júnior MS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):853-9. PubMed ID: 19461325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biocompatibility of steroid-HA delivery system using adult castrated rams as a model.
    Benghuzzi H; England B
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():275-80. PubMed ID: 11347402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft tissue response of the larynx to silicone, Gore-Tex, and irradiated cartilage implants.
    Ustundag E; Boyaci Z; Keskin G; Kaur A; Ozkarakas H
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jun; 115(6):1009-14. PubMed ID: 15933511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological evaluation of pliable hydroxyapatite-ethylene vinyl acetate co-polymer composites intended for cranioplasty.
    Velayudhan S; Anilkumar TV; Kumary TV; Mohanan PV; Fernandez AC; Varma HK; Ramesh P
    Acta Biomater; 2005 Mar; 1(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 16701797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biocompatibility of resin composites subcutaneously implanted in rats with experimentally induced arthritis.
    Anagnostou M; Chatzigianni E; Doucoudakis S; Potamianou A; Tesseromatis C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):863-7. PubMed ID: 19203785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cytological evaluation of the tissue-implant reaction associated with subcutaneous implantation of polymers coated with titaniumcarboxonitride in vivo.
    Lehle K; Lohn S; Reinerth GG; Schubert T; Preuner JG; Birnbaum DE
    Biomaterials; 2004 Nov; 25(24):5457-66. PubMed ID: 15142726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tissue implantation test in rabbits with gelatine sponges.
    Schoenmakers AC; Funken C; Enninga IC; Henning G
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1998 Oct; 48(10):1028-32. PubMed ID: 9825122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro biocompatibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites.
    Wenz LM; Merritt K; Brown SA; Moet A; Steffee AD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Feb; 24(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 2329115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of bulk versus particulate polymethylmethacrylate on bone.
    Goodman SB; Fornasier VL; Kei J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jul; (232):255-62. PubMed ID: 3289814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cell and tissue reactions to composites and newly-developed restoration resins (Isosit) in a biological experiment].
    Welker D; Neupert G; Katenkamp D
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1980; 68(7):659-67. PubMed ID: 6451999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.