These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3558749)
1. Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact. Fein G; Brown FF J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1987 Apr; 9(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 3558749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Backward contralateral masking by light and by random pattern. Jarvis B; Vormbrock J; Saccuzzo DP Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Aug; 57(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 6622151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual masking with presentations in same and opposite visual fields: evidence for contralateral masking. Saccuzzo DP; Michael BE; Rowe R Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Aug; 55(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 7133895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dichoptic backward masking of letters, words, and trigrams in old and young subjects. Cramer G; Kietzman ML; van Laer J Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 7128655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of stimulus degradation on letter-matching performance of left and right hemispheric stroke patients. Wolcott CL; Saul RE; Hellige JB; Kumar S J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1990 Mar; 12(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 2341552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Figural relationship effects and mechanisms of visual masking. Hellige JB; Walsh DA; Lawrence VW; Prasse M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Feb; 5(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 528933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The crossmodal facilitation of visual object representations by sound: evidence from the backward masking paradigm. Chen YC; Spence C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1784-802. PubMed ID: 21942418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Separate training of hemispheres to perform visual discrimination in conditions of blocking of interhemisphere transmission by masking. Glezer VD; Nevskaya AA; Chernova ND; Gauzel'man VE Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2005 Mar; 35(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 15875495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Interaction effects in the lateral visual field: an extension of Bouma's (1970) approach]. Heller D; Huckauf A; Nazir T Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(3):386-418. PubMed ID: 8640479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Binocular rivalry and dichoptic masking: suppressed stimuli do not mask stimuli in a dominating eye. Westendorf DH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 2527957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lateral masking, levels of processing and stimulus category: a comparative study between normal and dyslexic readers. Pernet C; Valdois S; Celsis P; Démonet JF Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2374-85. PubMed ID: 16777147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An event-related potential examination of attended and unattended stimuli in visual selection using bilateral stimulus presentation. Drysdale KA; Finlay DC; Fulham WR Biol Psychol; 1995 Feb; 39(2-3):115-29. PubMed ID: 7734626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Asymmetry of visual perception]. Kostandov EA; Reshchikova TN; Shostakovich GS; Genkina OA Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1977; 27(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 899258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]