These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35588076)

  • 21. Absolute and relative knowledge of ordinal position on implied lists.
    Kao T; Jensen G; Michaelcheck C; Ferrera VP; Terrace HS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Dec; 46(12):2227-2243. PubMed ID: 31750719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A recommendation for applied researchers to substantiate the claim that ordinal variables are the product of underlying bivariate normal distributions.
    Kampen JK; Weeren A
    Qual Quant; 2017; 51(5):2163-2170. PubMed ID: 28867833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Knowledge of the ordinal position of list items in pigeons.
    Scarf D; Colombo M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):483-7. PubMed ID: 21574738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scale length does matter: Recommendations for measurement invariance testing with categorical factor analysis and item response theory approaches.
    D'Urso ED; De Roover K; Vermunt JK; Tijmstra J
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2114-2145. PubMed ID: 34910286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis.
    Cai L; Yang JS; Hansen M
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):221-48. PubMed ID: 21534682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of sample size and distributional assumptions on competing models of the factor structure of the PANSS and BPRS.
    Tueller SJ; Johnson KL; Grimm KJ; Desmarais SL; Sellers BG; Van Dorn RA
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2017 Dec; 26(4):. PubMed ID: 27910162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ridge structural equation modelling with correlation matrices for ordinal and continuous data.
    Yuan KH; Wu R; Bentler PM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Feb; 64(Pt 1):107-33. PubMed ID: 21506947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical presentation and analysis of ordinal data in nursing research.
    Jakobsson U
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2004 Dec; 18(4):437-40. PubMed ID: 15598252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of a Longitudinal IRTree Model: Response Style Changes Over Time.
    Ames AJ; Leventhal BC
    Assessment; 2023 Mar; 30(2):332-347. PubMed ID: 34663110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
    Chen Y; Li X; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):124-146. PubMed ID: 30456747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Risky business: factor analysis of survey data - assessing the probability of incorrect dimensionalisation.
    van der Eijk C; Rose J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118900. PubMed ID: 25789992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The challenges of fitting an item response theory model to the Social Anhedonia Scale.
    Reise SP; Horan WP; Blanchard JJ
    J Pers Assess; 2011 May; 93(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 21516580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An Exploratory Diagnostic Model for Ordinal Responses with Binary Attributes: Identifiability and Estimation.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):921-940. PubMed ID: 31432312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A flexible full-information approach to the modeling of response styles.
    Falk CF; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):328-47. PubMed ID: 26641273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of ignoring clustered data structure in confirmatory factor analysis of ordered polytomous items: a simulation study based on PANSS.
    Stochl J; Jones PB; Perez J; Khandaker GM; Böhnke JR; Croudace TJ
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2016 Sep; 25(3):205-19. PubMed ID: 26096674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selecting polychoric instrumental variables in confirmatory factor analysis: An alternative specification test and effects of instrumental variables.
    Jin S; Cao C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):387-413. PubMed ID: 29323415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of a four-parameter item response theory model.
    Loken E; Rulison KL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):509-25. PubMed ID: 20030965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Item response theory analysis of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure.
    Eichenbaum AE; Marcus DK; French BF
    Psychol Assess; 2021 Aug; 33(8):766-776. PubMed ID: 33856827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Coefficients of feasibility for ordinal response scales].
    Elosua Oliden P; Zumbo BD
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):896-901. PubMed ID: 18940100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.