These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3558960)

  • 61. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Spontaneous classification of complex tones at high and ultrasonic frequencies in the bat, Megaderma lyra.
    Preisler A; Schmidt S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2595-607. PubMed ID: 9604354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effect of duration on the frequency discrimination of individual partials in a complex tone and on the discrimination of fundamental frequency.
    Gockel HE; Moore BC; Carlyon RP; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):373-82. PubMed ID: 17297792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Latency effect of the pitch response due to variations of frequency and spectral envelope.
    Ritter S; Dosch HG; Specht HJ; Schneider P; Rupp A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 118(10):2276-81. PubMed ID: 17709289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies.
    Donaldson GS; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1645-58. PubMed ID: 10738818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A comparison of monotic and dichotic complex-tone pitch perception in listeners with hearing loss.
    Arehart KH; Burns EM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):993-7. PubMed ID: 10462804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Effects of asynchrony and ear of presentation on the pitch of mistuned partials in harmonic and frequency-shifted complex tones.
    Brunstrom JM; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):391-401. PubMed ID: 11508964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Accuracy of pitch matching for pure tones and for complex tones with overlapping or nonoverlapping harmonics.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Proctor GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3443-50. PubMed ID: 1619120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Perceived continuity and pitch shifts for complex tones with unresolved harmonics.
    Plack CJ; Watkinson RK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1922-9. PubMed ID: 20968364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Psychophysical tuning curves for combination tones 2f1-f2 and f2-f1.
    Formby C; Sachs RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1754-8. PubMed ID: 7372931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The effect of hearing loss on the resolution of partials and fundamental frequency discrimination.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2891-901. PubMed ID: 22087918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Grouping and the pitch of a mistuned fundamental component: Effects of applying simultaneous multiple mistunings to the other harmonics.
    Roberts B; Holmes SD
    Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 222(1-2):79-88. PubMed ID: 17055676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Pitch perception of complex tones and human temporal-lobe function.
    Zatorre RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):566-72. PubMed ID: 3170948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Implicit and explicit statistical learning of tone sequences across spectral shifts.
    Daikoku T; Yatomi Y; Yumoto M
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():194-204. PubMed ID: 25192632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Long CJ; Deeks JM; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):621-33. PubMed ID: 12186042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Pitch identification of simultaneous dichotic two-tone complexes.
    Beerends JG; Houtsma AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Oct; 80(4):1048-56. PubMed ID: 3771925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effects of frequency-modulated auditory tones on the voice fundamental frequency in humans.
    Sapir S; McClean MD; Luschei ES
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):1070-3. PubMed ID: 6841812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Pitch shifts contingent on the modulation frequency of an adaptation tone.
    Smith AT; May JG; Lyman RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):691-3. PubMed ID: 6841808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Some empirical observations on sound level properties of recorded piano tones.
    Repp BH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):1136-44. PubMed ID: 8445121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. On the pitches of the components of a complex tone.
    Hartmann WM; Doty SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):567-78. PubMed ID: 8568044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.