These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35589906)
1. Integrated strategic planning and multi-criteria decision-making framework with its application to agricultural water management. Radmehr A; Bozorg-Haddad O; LoƔiciga HA Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8406. PubMed ID: 35589906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing an integrated risk management framework for agricultural water conveyance and distribution systems within fuzzy decision making approaches. Orojloo M; Hashemy Shahdany SM; Roozbahani A Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 627():1363-1376. PubMed ID: 30857100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regional agricultural water resources management with respect to fuzzy return and energy constraint under uncertainty: An integrated optimization approach. Luo Z; Xie Y; Ji L; Cai Y; Yang Z; Huang G J Contam Hydrol; 2021 Oct; 242():103863. PubMed ID: 34375788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptation strategies for water supply management in a drought prone Mediterranean river basin: Application of outranking method. Kumar V; Del Vasto-Terrientes L; Valls A; Schuhmacher M Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 540():344-57. PubMed ID: 26277442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An index-based robust decision making framework for watershed management in a changing climate. Kim Y; Chung ES Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():88-102. PubMed ID: 24365586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A fuzzy multi-stakeholder multi-criteria methodology for water allocation and reuse in metropolitan areas. Pourmand E; Mahjouri N Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jun; 190(7):444. PubMed ID: 29961116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effective allocation of resources in water pollution treatment alternatives: a multi-stage gray group decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Wang J; Qian W; Du J; Liu Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):3173-3186. PubMed ID: 31838682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A mixed-methods approach to strategic planning for multi-benefit regional water infrastructure. Harris-Lovett S; Lienert J; Sedlak D J Environ Manage; 2019 Mar; 233():218-237. PubMed ID: 30580118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrated modeling of agricultural scenarios (IMAS) to support pesticide action plans: the case of the Coulonge drinking water catchment area (SW France). Vernier F; Leccia-Phelpin O; Lescot JM; Minette S; Miralles A; Barberis D; Scordia C; Kuentz-Simonet V; Tonneau JP Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar; 24(8):6923-6950. PubMed ID: 27726081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of irrigation systems using sustainability-related criteria. Manoliadis OG J Environ Qual; 2001; 30(4):1150-3. PubMed ID: 11476491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainable implementation of effective green supply chain management practices. Boutkhoum O; Hanine M; Boukhriss H; Agouti T; Tikniouine A Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):664. PubMed ID: 27350904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk regulation of water allocation in irrigation areas under changing water supply and demand conditions. Zhou Y; Xu X; Li M; Zhang X; Cao K J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 313():114945. PubMed ID: 35367673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agricultural Water Resources Management Using Maximum Entropy and Entropy-Weight-Based TOPSIS Methods. Li M; Sun H; Singh VP; Zhou Y; Ma M Entropy (Basel); 2019 Apr; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33267078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of future water demand and supply using WEAP model in Dhasan River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India. Nivesh S; Patil JP; Goyal VC; Saran B; Singh AK; Raizada A; Malik A; Kuriqi A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):27289-27302. PubMed ID: 36380179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A decision-making framework for evaluating environmental tradeoffs in enhancing ecosystem services across complex agricultural landscapes. Acero Triana JS; Chu ML; Shipley NJ; van Riper CJ; Stewart WP; Suski CD J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 314():115077. PubMed ID: 35472836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating water resources management scenarios considering the hierarchical structure of decision-makers and ecosystem services-based criteria. Behboudian M; Kerachian R; Motlaghzadeh K; Ashrafi S Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jan; 751():141759. PubMed ID: 32892079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A stochastic modeling approach for analyzing water resources systems. Li Y; Cai Y; Fu Q; Wang X; Li C; Liu Q; Xu R J Contam Hydrol; 2021 Oct; 242():103865. PubMed ID: 34450526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal Allocation of Water Resources and Eco-Compensation Mechanism Model Based on the Interval-Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Method for Tingjiang River. Hao N; Sun P; Yang L; Qiu Y; Chen Y; Zhao W Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]