These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35589991)
1. Historical perspective of vaginal hysterectomy: the resilience of art and evidence-based medicine in the age of technology. Marquini GV; de Oliveira LM; Martins SB; Takano CC; de Jarmy Di-Bella ZIK; Sartori MGF Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 May; 307(5):1377-1384. PubMed ID: 35589991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Garry R; Fountain J; Brown J; Manca A; Mason S; Sculpher M; Napp V; Bridgman S; Gray J; Lilford R Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(26):1-154. PubMed ID: 15215018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM]. Kovachev S; Ganovska A; Stankova T Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 1 Pt 1():4-10. PubMed ID: 27514161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy? Beck TL; Morse CB; Gray HJ; Goff BA; Urban RR; Liao JB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):348.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26470825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lee SH; Oh SR; Cho YJ; Han M; Park JW; Kim SJ; Yun JH; Choe SY; Choi JS; Bae JW BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):83. PubMed ID: 31234852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of Laparoendoscopic Single-site and Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy Compared with Multiport Hysterectomy: Real Benefits or Diminishing Returns? Michener CM; Lampert E; Yao M; Harnegie MP; Chalif J; Chambers LM J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):698-709.e1. PubMed ID: 33346073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function. Okcu NT; Gürbüz T; Uysal G J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 50(4):101977. PubMed ID: 33166707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital in Turkey. Inal ZO; Inal HA Ir J Med Sci; 2018 May; 187(2):485-491. PubMed ID: 28726032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Formal institutional guidelines promotes the vaginal approach to hysterectomy in patients with benign disease and non-prolapsed uterus. Chrysostomou A; Djokovic D; Libhaber E; Edridge W; van Herendael BJ Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Apr; 259():133-139. PubMed ID: 33662755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Blikkendaal MD; Schepers EM; van Zwet EW; Twijnstra AR; Jansen FW Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):723-38. PubMed ID: 25773357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Lawrie TA; Liu H; Lu D; Dowswell T; Song H; Wang L; Shi G Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 4(4):CD011422. PubMed ID: 30985921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the role of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the everyday practice of gynecology. Han GS J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):521-8. PubMed ID: 8829066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced Complications Following Implementation of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Danish Population-based Cohort Study of Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic Surgery between 2004 and 2018. Settnes A; Topsoee MF; Moeller C; Dueholm M; Kopp TI; Norrbom C; Rasmussen SC; Froeslev PA; Joergensen A; Dreisler E; Gimbel H J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1344-1353.e3. PubMed ID: 31740432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct cost of hysterectomy: comparison of robotic versus other routes. Kaaki B; Lewis E; Takallapally S; Cleveland B J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):305-310. PubMed ID: 31165995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]